40/ 100
F
OverallF32/100
TomTom Multi-Sport GPS Watch

TomTom · Waterproof Smartwatches & Fitness Trackers

TomTom Multi-Sport GPS Watch

F · High PFAS

Sports watch with waterproof treatment; PFAS risk unclear without transparency.

Verdict: SkipSports watch with undisclosed waterproof coating (likely PFAS-based); no recalls or material hazards documented, but brand opacity on chemical composition warrants cautious use.

TomTom does not publicly disclose PFAS use or avoidance in this GPS watch. Waterproof polymer coatings may contain PFAS, but brand silence prevents assessment.

The safe swap

Swatch Chrono 42 Quartz Watch

Swatch

Swatch Chrono 42 Quartz Watch

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

plastic/elastomer case with waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The TomTom Multi-Sport GPS Watch uses a plastic/elastomer case with a waterproof coating treatment. Waterproof coatings on sports watches typically employ fluorinated compounds (PFAS-class chemicals) to repel water and sweat, though TomTom has not publicly disclosed the specific chemistry. The elastomer strap material may include additives like plasticizers or UV stabilizers, standard for durable wearables but not itemized in available product literature.

The brand's record and disclosure

TomTom has not issued public statements on PFAS use, chemical safety testing, or material certifications for this model. The brand does not maintain a visible chemical transparency policy comparable to some outdoor gear manufacturers. No recalls, contamination incidents, or third-party safety controversies have been documented for this specific product line.

How it compares in its category

Most GPS sports watches (Garmin, Suunto, Polar) use similar plastic-elastomer construction with waterproof treatments; few brands disclose fluorinated compound use. TomTom's lack of transparency is typical for the category rather than exceptional. Competitors rarely publish independent testing for leachables or coating degradation, making direct comparison difficult.

If you buy it

Rinse the watch with fresh water after saltwater or heavy sweat exposure to minimize salt-driven coating wear. Avoid prolonged exposure to direct heat (above 50°C or 122°F) or harsh solvents, which may degrade the waterproof layer. Replace the elastomer strap if visible cracking or material softening occurs, as deterioration can expose underlying plastic. Store dry and away from sunlight to extend waterproof integrity.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Waterproof coating degradation over time

The fluorinated waterproof treatment (likely PFAS-based, unconfirmed) may shed or degrade with use, especially after saltwater exposure or UV aging. No published data on TomTom's coating durability or particulate release during wear.

None known

Elastomer strap plasticizers and additives

Elastomer straps typically contain phthalates or alternative plasticizers for flexibility; TomTom does not disclose strap chemistry. No recalls or contamination reports exist for this model, and direct skin contact is minimal.

None known

Plastic case leaching from thermal stress

The plastic housing could theoretically release additives if exposed to sustained heat above typical use conditions. No documented incidents for TomTom sports watches, and normal wrist-worn use remains well below stress thresholds.

Possible

Lack of chemical disclosure and testing transparency

TomTom does not publish third-party material testing, certification standards, or waterproof treatment chemistry. This opacity prevents independent verification of coating composition and long-term safety profiles.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Smartwatches & Fitness Trackers

Swatch Chrono 42 Quartz Watch

Swatch

Chrono 42 Quartz Watch

Stainless steel case, mineral/plastic crystal, standard watch components

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Standard watch materials pose minimal PFAS risk.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Swatch SEA WASP

Swatch

SEA WASP

Plastic/resin watch case and strap

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Typical consumer watch, no known PFAS risk signal identified

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Swatch Neon Seppia Big Bold Chrono Quartz Watch

Swatch

Neon Seppia Big Bold Chrono Quartz Watch

Stainless steel case, plastic/resin band, mineral or acrylic crystal

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Standard watch materials typically lack intentional PFAS use.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof smartwatches & fitness trackers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.