20/ 100
F
OverallF16/100
Tommy Hilfiger Men's Regular Fit Performance Shirt

Tommy Hilfiger · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Tommy Hilfiger Men's Regular Fit Performance Shirt

F · High PFAS

Performance apparel likely treated with water-repellent coating, PFAS risk unclear without disclosure

Verdict: SkipPolyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment poses unclear PFAS risk; no major toxicant hazards reported, but performance finishes warrant cautious laundering and disclosure transparency.

Tommy Hilfiger does not disclose PFAS or water-repellent coating treatment details for this performance shirt. Polyester blends with water/stain resistance often use PFAS-based finishes, but no public confirmation exists for this specific product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with performance water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This shirt is a polyester blend (exact percentage not specified in typical product labeling) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric surface. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS chemicals, though some brands have transitioned to PFAS-free alternatives; Tommy Hilfiger has not publicly disclosed which type is used on this garment. Polyester itself is a synthetic polymer with no inherent toxicant risk during normal wear, but the applied finish is the variable of concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tommy Hilfiger (owned by PVH Corp.) has not issued a transparent, public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments across its performance apparel lines, nor does it typically disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on product labels or websites. The brand has faced no major documented recalls or toxicant controversies specific to this product line. Without explicit PFAS-free certification or third-party testing data, the water-repellent coating treatment chemistry remains a black box for consumers.

How it compares in its category

Performance polyester shirts with water-repellent coating finishes are standard across the mid-market casual and athletic sector. Competitors like Columbia and some Patagonia lines have moved toward PFAS-free water repellency or clearly labeled their chemistry; Tommy Hilfiger lags in transparency. For consumers prioritizing low chemical exposure, brands with explicit PFAS-free water-repellent coating claims or certification (e.g., bluesign, OEKO-TEX STeP) offer more assurance, though at potentially higher price points.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water (below 60°C / 140°F) to minimize potential leaching of finish chemicals. Use mild detergent and avoid fabric softeners, which can interact with water-repellent coating coatings and reduce their efficacy. Expect the water-repellent finish to degrade over 20-30 washes; reapplication products are available but carry their own chemical exposure risk. If PFAS exposure is a personal health priority, contact Tommy Hilfiger directly to request water-repellent coating treatment disclosure before purchase.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

No recalls or documented issues specific to Tommy Hilfiger performance apparel colorants. Polyester dyes used in mass-market casual wear are generally compliant with consumer product safety standards, though no brand-specific testing data is publicly available.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in fabric treatments

No evidence that this product line uses formaldehyde-based durable-press or wrinkle-resistant finishes. Performance water-repellent coating treatments are chemically distinct, but brand does not disclose all finishing agents.

None known

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony trioxide is a known catalyst in polyester production but is not shed during normal wear or laundering in concentrations that pose dermal or ingestion risk. No specific testing data for Tommy Hilfiger polyester shirts exists in public domain.

Possible

Fragrance and chemical finish volatiles

water-repellent coating-treated performance fabrics may off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during initial wear or when heated. This is not a documented health hazard at consumer exposure levels but can trigger respiratory sensitivity in chemically sensitive individuals.

None known

Microplastic shedding

Polyester sheds microfibers during washing, a known environmental concern, but this is not a direct consumer health hazard. No brand-specific data on shedding rate is available.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.