20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Titleist StaDry Cart Mitts

Titleist · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves

Titleist StaDry Cart Mitts

F · High PFAS

Skip until brand discloses PFAS treatment details.

Verdict: SkipWater-repellent treatment likely contains PFAS; brand silent on composition. Non-PFAS hazards minimal for gloves. Disclose or switch.

Titleist StaDry cart mitts use water-repellent treatment typical of golf apparel, but brand provides no PFAS disclosure. water-repellent coating coatings often contain legacy PFAS; verification absent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic fabric with water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Titleist StaDry Cart Mitts are synthetic fabric (likely polyester or nylon blend) treated with a water-repellent finish. The repellency mechanism is the primary concern: most water-resistant textiles use fluorochemical coatings (PFAS-based) or water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatments that shed microfibers and may leach during washing. Synthetic fabrics themselves pose minimal acute hazard, but the finish durability and composition determine long-term safety.

The brand's record and disclosure

Titleist (Acushnet Holdings) has not publicly disclosed PFAS content in apparel or whether they use fluorochemical water-repellent coating treatments. The brand maintains no visible sustainability report addressing PFAS "forever chemicals" in textiles. Without manufacturer transparency on water-repellent chemistry, the specific fluorochemical type and concentration remain unknown, making informed risk assessment impossible.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves and cart mitts typically use either fluorochemical or non-fluorochemical water-repellent coating finishes; premium brands increasingly market PFOA-free alternatives but do not always disclose alternative chemicals. Competitors like FootJoy and Callaway similarly lack public PFAS statements. Cart mitts are lower-priority items compared to frequently washed athletic wear, but synthetic glove fiber shedding into skin contact warrants clarity on treatment chemistry.

If you buy it

Wear gloves directly over skin; wash separately in cold water and hang-dry to preserve repellency and minimize microfiber release. Do not machine-dry, as heat can accelerate coating degradation and fiber shedding. Replace when grip wears or water beading stops; typical lifespan is 1-2 seasons. If you have known sensitivity to fluorochemicals or fragrance, request product material safety data sheet (MSDS) from Titleist before purchase.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fluorochemical water-repellent coating (PFAS family)

Water-repellent coating almost certainly contains PFAS-based or alternative fluorinated compounds; exact chemistry and concentration undisclosed by Titleist. Skin contact and microfiber ingestion pose minimal acute risk but chronic exposure profile unknown.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in synthetic textiles

No specific reports of formaldehyde-based dyes or finishes in Titleist golf gloves. Most synthetic athletic wear uses low-formaldehyde or formaldehyde-free processes, but brand provides no certification.

None known

Azo dyes

StaDry mitts typically feature dark colors (brown, black, white) common in golf gear. Azo dyes are regulated in textiles but no reported violations specific to Titleist apparel or this product.

Possible

Antimony in polyester

Polyester blends may contain antimony trioxide as a catalyst; levels in finished textiles are typically low and regulated, but Titleist does not disclose catalyst composition or testing limits.

Likely

Microfiber shedding during wash and wear

Synthetic fabric gloves shed microplastics during laundering and skin friction. Extent depends on fiber denier and finish durability; water-resistant treatments can accelerate fiber breakage and shedding over repeated wash cycles.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Risky category by default

Bridgestone Soft Grip Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Soft Grip Golf Glove

Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles

D
D · Elevated

Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.

Risky category by default

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

D
D · Elevated

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Risky category by default

More golf balls & golf gloves grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.