Titleist · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Amazon Com Titleist Rain Gloves FINGER TEN Men’s Golf Glove Left Hand Right Handed Golfer Rain Grip Pack, Durable Fit Fo
Rain grip glove; coating composition undisclosed, skip if PFAS-concerned.
Titleist rain gloves use water-resistant coating on synthetic materials but provide no PFAS transparency. water-repellent coating-treated apparel often contains PFAS, though specifics unknown here.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Synthetic leather/microfiber with water-resistant coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Titleist rain gloves use synthetic microfiber leather with a water-resistant topcoat. The coating composition is not publicly disclosed by Titleist or Amazon. Water-resistant finishes on textiles commonly rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS family) to repel moisture, though some manufacturers use Teflon-type coating or other polymers. Without transparency, the specific chemistry and durability of this coating cannot be verified.
The brand's record and disclosure
Titleist (Acushnet Holdings) does not publicly disclose PFAS use in apparel or provide chemical transparency statements for golf gloves. The brand has not faced major textile safety recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye controversies on record. However, the silence on water-repellent coating composition is typical of golf equipment makers and reflects an industry gap in consumer disclosure rather than a specific Titleist commitment.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves as a category rarely disclose coating chemistry; this is standard practice across Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, and others. Synthetic microfiber gloves are safer than leather alternatives (lower heavy metal risk in finishes) but still depend on proprietary water-resistant treatments. Most rain golf gloves offer no third-party testing or PFAS labeling, making this product unremarkable either way.
If you buy it
Hand wash in cool water with mild soap; avoid hot water or machine washing, which can degrade the water-resistant coating and potentially mobilize leachables. Do not dry-clean or use solvents. Replace when grip diminishes or coating visibly peels or cracks, typically after one to two seasons of regular use. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to extend coating life.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Water-resistant coating composition (undisclosed)
Titleist does not specify whether the rain-grip coating uses PFAS, Teflon-type coating, or other polymers. Fluorinated compounds are industry standard for durability but carry bioaccumulation and persistence concerns if PFAS-based.
Formaldehyde resins in synthetic microfiber
No recalls or reports of formaldehyde emissions from Titleist golf gloves. Microfiber production may involve trace resins, but finished gloves are low-risk for dermal contact and not intended for prolonged skin contact in warm conditions.
Azo dyes
No documented azo dye violations or skin reaction reports for Titleist gloves. Synthetic microfiber and topcoat finishes are generally compatible with safer dye chemistry.
Coating degradation and microplastic release
As the water-resistant topcoat breaks down over time (typical after one to two seasons), microscopic fragments may shed during washing. Scale is minor but not quantified for this specific product.
Heavy metals in dyes or pigments
No lead or cadmium contamination reported in Titleist textiles. Synthetic gloves carry lower heavy metal risk than natural leather, which may contain arsenic or chromium in tanning.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.