20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
The North Face Pack Rain Cover

The North Face · Waterproof Outdoor Accessories

The North Face Pack Rain Cover

F · High PFAS

water-repellent coating-coated pack cover; PFAS risk present but unconfirmed by brand.

Verdict: SkipNylon ripstop with water-repellent coating carries unconfirmed PFAS risk; no other major hazards documented. Purchase acceptable with awareness of PFAS uncertainty and proper care.

Rain covers typically use water-repellent coating coatings that often contain PFAS. The North Face provides no public disclosure of coating chemistry or PFAS-free status for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon ripstop with water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pack cover is nylon ripstop fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the surface. water-repellent coating coatings are the primary PFAS exposure pathway in outdoor textiles, as they use fluorochemical compounds to create water beading. The nylon substrate itself is inert, but the coating's longevity and exact chemistry remain undisclosed by The North Face in publicly available materials.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not publicly committed to eliminating PFAS from its water-repellent coating coatings or disclosed which specific water-repellent coating chemistry (legacy PFOA-based, GenX, or fluorine-free alternatives) is used in this product. The brand has faced pressure from environmental groups on PFAS but maintains no transparent certification or testing data for individual products. This silence makes independent verification of actual exposure risk impossible.

How it compares in its category

Most major outdoor gear brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) similarly use fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings without full PFAS transparency, though Patagonia has announced a transition toward fluorine-free alternatives. Pack covers made from untreated nylon or polyester eliminate water-repellent coating-related PFAS but sacrifice water repellency. This product sits in the middle: conventional performance with undisclosed chemical inputs.

If you buy it

Wash the cover separately from other clothing in cold water and air-dry; hot water and machine drying may accelerate coating degradation and potential leaching. Store dry to prevent mold growth on nylon. Replace when water-repellent coating visibly fails (water no longer beads). Avoid prolonged contact with skin if the coating flakes; rinse hands after extended handling. The cover's lifespan is typically 2-3 years with normal use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating formulation

water-repellent coating on ripstop nylon typically contains fluorochemicals; The North Face does not disclose whether legacy PFOA/PFOS or newer GenX-type compounds are used. No documented recalls or health incidents specific to this product, but the chemistry remains opaque.

None known

Azo dyes in nylon substrate

Ripstop nylon from major brands like The North Face generally meets textile safety standards for restricted azo dyes (EU REACH, Oeko-Tex). No specific concerns documented for this product line.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Nylon ripstop rarely uses formaldehyde-based resins as primary finishes; the water-repellent coating is the main chemical treatment. The North Face does not disclose formaldehyde content, but it is not a typical hazard in this material class.

Possible

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

As water-repellent coating ages or peels, small polymer and fluorochemical particles may shed into water or contact skin. This is a gradual process; no studies quantify migration from this specific product, but wear-over-time is a known limitation of coated textiles.

None known

Heavy metals in dyes or pigments

The North Face pack covers typically use standard synthetic dyes that comply with international textile heavy metal limits. No recalls or testing data indicate cadmium, lead, or antimony concerns for this product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Accessories

Sea To Summit Ultra- Sil Stuff Sack Set

Sea to Summit

Ultra- Sil Stuff Sack Set

Ultra-Sil nylon fabric, no water treatment applied

D
D · Elevated

Stuff sack with no waterproofing treatment.

Risky category by default

SEA TO Summit Ultra-Sil Pack Cover

Sea to Summit

Ultra-Sil Pack Cover

nylon with silicone water-repellent coating

F
F · High PFAS

PFC-free claim stated. No independent verification available yet.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof outdoor accessories grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.