The Honey Pot · Period Pads
Honey Pot Organic Cooling Herbal Infusion Heavy Flow Daytime Pads
Lower PFAS concern for typical period-pad construction, but no public PFAS transparency from brand.
The Honey Pot's pads use conventional pad materials (cellulose, cotton, polyethylene) with no evidence of Teflon-type coating, Teflon-family coating, or water-repellent coating treatments typical of PFAS sources. The brand makes no PFAS-related claims and provides no independent verification.
Shop The Honey Pot on Amazon →Material
Cellulose/viscose core, organic cotton cover, polyethylene backsheet
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This pad uses a cellulose/viscose core (absorbent layer), an organic cotton cover, and a polyethylene backsheet. Cellulose and viscose are wood-derived polymers that do not inherently leach hormonal disruptors or heavy metals when in contact with skin or menstrual fluid. Organic cotton certification means the cover avoids synthetic pesticide residues that conventional cotton may retain. The polyethylene backsheet is a common, inert moisture barrier with low skin reactivity.
The brand's record and disclosure
The Honey Pot markets this line as organic and natural-focused, which aligns with ingredient transparency trends in period-care. However, the brand has not published detailed material safety data sheets, third-party testing reports, or explicit statements on chlorine bleaching, heavy metals in viscose, or PFAS use in the backsheet. No major recalls, contamination reports, or regulatory actions appear in public records for this product or brand.
How it compares in its category
Organic cotton covers are considered a lower-chemical option compared to conventional cotton pads, which may carry pesticide residues. Cellulose/viscose cores are standard across mid-market and premium pads; they are generally safer than purely synthetic absorbents in terms of leaching risk. Polyethylene backsheets are typical industry-wide and do not pose known leaching hazards under normal use conditions.
If you buy it
Store pads in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight to prevent any minor polymer degradation. Change pads every 4-8 hours as recommended to reduce bacterial growth and odor, regardless of absorbency. If you experience itching, rash, or unusual discharge, discontinue use and consult a healthcare provider; individual sensitivity to cellulose, cotton, or adhesives can occur. Do not apply heat (e.g., microwave or direct flame) to the pad.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Chlorine bleaching residue in cellulose/viscose
Viscose and cellulose cores may be bleached during manufacturing; no public disclosure from The Honey Pot on bleach method or residue testing. Chlorine residues are typically minimal in finished pads but complete absence cannot be confirmed without third-party analysis.
Heavy metals in viscose fiber
Viscose production can involve sodium hydroxide and carbon disulfide processes; trace heavy metals (cadmium, lead) may persist if source wood or processing water is contaminated. The Honey Pot does not publicly test for or disclose heavy metal limits in the core.
Adhesive or tackifier allergens
Period pads typically use acrylate-based adhesives to secure the pad to underwear; formaldehyde releasers or acrylate monomers can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. No specific adhesive chemistry is disclosed by The Honey Pot for this product.
Dioxin formation from bleaching
Modern pad manufacturing in regulated markets rarely produces detectable dioxins; however, no independent testing of this specific product or brand has been published to rule out trace presence entirely.
Microplastic fragmentation from polyethylene backsheet
Polyethylene backsheets do not shed microplastics under normal room-temperature storage and use. Degradation would only occur under prolonged heat or UV exposure, which is not typical for stored pads.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Period Pads
Organyc
Corman Organyc Certified Organic Cotton Feminine Pads
Certified organic cotton, no synthetic coatings disclosed
Lower-concern choice; organic cotton without disclosed coatings reduces PFAS risk, though brand offers no explicit assurance.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Organyc
Feminine Pads
Organic cotton, cellulose
Lower-concern choice; organic cotton base + explicit PFAS-free positioning + third-party certs.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Organyc
The Honey Pot Company Organic Herbal Regular Pads
organic cotton, cellulose core
Lower-concern period product; organic cotton pads unlikely to contain PFAS, though brand remains silent on testing.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More period pads grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.