70/ 100
C
OverallD66/100
The Honey Pot Company Super Absorbency 100% Organic Cotton Core Tampons w/Bio Plastic Applicator

The Honest Company · Tampons

The Honey Pot Company Super Absorbency 100% Organic Cotton Core Tampons w/Bio Plastic Applicator

C · Moderate

Lower concern; organic cotton core and plant-based applicator reduce PFAS risk, but lack third-party PFAS testing.

Verdict: BuyOrganic cotton core and plant-based applicator minimize conventional chemical exposure; limited third-party testing but no established safety incidents on record.

The Honey Pot's emphasis on organic cotton and bio-plastic materials is a positive signal, these substrates rarely require PFAS coatings. However, the brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or certification. The bioplastic applicator's exact composition is unspecified, leaving a small gap in assurance.

Shop The Honest Company on Amazon →

Material

100% organic cotton core; bio-based plastic applicator

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The core is 100% organic cotton, which means it was grown without synthetic pesticides, herbicides, or GMO seeds, reducing residual chemical burden compared to conventional cotton tampons. The applicator is bio-based plastic, typically derived from plant materials like sugarcane or corn rather than petroleum, which lowers reliance on persistent synthetic polymers. Organic cotton still undergoes bleaching and processing, but the elimination of pesticide contamination at the fiber level is the primary safety advantage in this product class. The absence of rayon or viscose (which can carry manufacturing residues) further narrows the chemical exposure window.

The brand's record and disclosure

The Honest Company markets heavily on transparency and clean ingredients across its product line, but detailed third-party testing results for this specific tampon line are not publicly available. The brand does not explicitly publish PFAS testing data or certifications like Cradle to Cradle or GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) for this product, despite claiming organic status. No major recalls or safety incidents involving this tampon product have been documented in regulatory databases. The brand's overall posture emphasizes marketing claims over independent verification, which is typical for consumer brands in this category but limits confidence in chemical safety assertions.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional tampons use bleached rayon or viscose blended with cotton, which can introduce dioxins and furans from the bleaching process; organic cotton eliminates that source. Petroleum-based plastic applicators are the industry standard, so a plant-derived applicator reduces non-renewable input, though the actual safety hazard profile depends on processing method. Tampons marketed as 'natural' or 'organic' typically cost 20-40% more than conventional options but offer genuine material advantages, not just branding. This product sits in the mid-to-premium tier of the organic tampon market, comparable to Seventh Generation or Cora but with less independent certification transparency.

If you buy it

No special storage or usage precautions are required beyond standard tampon hygiene: change every 4-8 hours to reduce toxic shock syndrome risk, regardless of material. The bio-plastic applicator is not heat-sensitive in normal use and will degrade in standard landfill or compost settings faster than conventional plastic, though municipal composting facilities rarely accept hygiene products. Discontinue use immediately if you experience any unusual irritation, itching, or allergic reaction, as individual sensitivity to organic cotton processing residues (though rare) is still possible. Consider requesting third-party GOTS or OEKO-TEX certification from the brand if transparency is a priority for you; this signals market demand for independent verification.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Dioxins and furans from bleaching

Organic cotton processing still involves bleaching, but regulatory oversight of textile bleaching has tightened in recent years and measurable dioxin levels in finished tampons are not documented in available literature. The risk is substantially lower than conventional rayon-based tampons.

None known

Pesticide residues in cotton fiber

Organic certification requires pesticide-free cultivation, so this specific hazard is mitigated by the supply chain claim, though no independent testing of this product line is publicly available to confirm residue absence.

Possible

Allergens or irritants from bio-plastic applicator

Plant-based plastics can be derived from corn, sugarcane, or cellulose; processing may introduce traces of catalyst residues or mold inhibitors. Individual sensitivity is rare but not ruled out without formal biocompatibility testing data from the manufacturer.

None known

Chlorine-based residues from processing

No established contamination with chlorine compounds or related byproducts is on record for this brand's tampon line, and organic cotton production typically uses lower-chlorine bleaching protocols than conventional textiles.

None known

Talc or talc-adjacent mineral contaminants

Talc is not a standard ingredient in tampons (it is used in some body powders and cosmetics); this hazard is not relevant to tampons but included for completeness in personal care product review.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Tampons

Seventh Generation Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator

Seventh Generation

Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator

organic cotton (tampon & applicator core); cardboard applicator

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern buy, organic cotton & MADE SAFE cert reduce PFAS risk, though brand is silent on the topic.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

LOLA Organic Cotton Tampons

Lola

Organic Cotton Tampons

organic cotton (no synthetic coatings)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern, uncoated organic cotton with transparent PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE CertifiedOrganic (USDA/OCS equivalent)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Organic Tampons with Applicator

Cora

Organic Tampons with Applicator

organic cotton tampon with cardboard/plastic applicator

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; organic base material and MADE SAFE cert suggest thoughtful sourcing, but no explicit PFAS commitment.

MADE SAFE CertifiedLeaping Bunny

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More tampons grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.