The Honest Company · Tampons
The Honey Pot 100% Organic Duo-Pack Regular-Super Tampons, 18 Ea
Lower concern; standard organic tampons unlikely to contain intentional PFAS, but lack of explicit testing claim.
The Honey Pot's organic tampons are made from cotton and rayon without disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant treatments typical of PFAS applications. The brand does not claim PFAS-free status or provide third-party testing data. Tampons are a low-risk category for PFAS exposure compared to food-contact or performance apparel.
Shop The Honest Company on Amazon →Material
Organic cotton, rayon
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This product uses organic cotton and rayon (viscose) fibers. Organic cotton avoids synthetic pesticide residues that accumulate in conventional cotton, which is heavily sprayed during growth. Rayon is a regenerated cellulose fiber; the viscose process uses sodium hydroxide and carbon disulfide, but these are largely removed during manufacturing and do not persist in the finished fiber. The combination prioritizes reduced chemical exposure during production compared to bleached conventional cotton tampons.
The brand's record and disclosure
The Honest Company markets itself on transparency and clean ingredients across personal care; they emphasize organic certification on this product but do not publish detailed third-party testing reports for heavy metals, dioxins, or chlorine residues on their website. The brand holds Consumer Goods Forum commitments on chemical safety. No recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this tampon line. Independent lab testing by organizations like Women's Voices for the Earth has not flagged The Honey Pot tampons for unexpected contaminants, though limited testing data exists for this specific product.
How it compares in its category
Organic tampons sit at the lower-risk end of the category because they avoid chlorine bleaching (which can generate dioxin trace residues) and pesticide residues. Conventional bleached tampons often use elemental chlorine or ECF (elemental-chlorine-free) bleaching; organic alternatives typically use oxygen-based methods. This product is comparable to competitors like Seventh Generation and Cora in material choice; it lacks explicit third-party dioxin or heavy metal testing claims that some premium brands publish.
If you buy it
Tampons do not require special care beyond dry storage away from humidity and heat to prevent mold. Replace tampons every 4 to 8 hours depending on flow; leaving them in longer than 8 hours increases toxic shock syndrome risk, which is a user-behavior issue, not a product defect. Check the packaging for signs of moisture or damage before use. No special disposal guidance applies beyond standard municipal waste or compost where tampons are accepted (some are compostable, though this product is not labeled as such).
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Dioxins and furan residues from bleaching
Even oxygen-based bleaching can generate trace dioxins; no third-party testing report from The Honest Company confirms non-detection. Industry-wide dioxin levels in organic tampons are typically far lower than in chlorine-bleached conventional products, but 'organic' labeling does not guarantee zero dioxin testing.
Chlorine residues
Organic certification excludes chlorine bleaching, so intentional chlorine exposure is ruled out. Incidental trace chlorine from water or processing is possible but not reported as a concern in organic cotton tampons.
Heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic) in fiber
Cotton and rayon can absorb trace metals from soil or processing water; organic certification reduces pesticide-related metal co-contaminants but does not mandate heavy metal testing. No published test results from The Honest Company rule this in or out for this product.
Fragrance or irritant additives
The Honey Pot line is marketed as fragrance-free and without synthetic additives. No reported cases of contact dermatitis or chemical irritation linked to this product are on record.
Rayon fiber degradation and shedding
Rayon fibers do not degrade or shed microparticles during normal use in the way some synthetic materials might. Rayon is biodegradable and poses no microplastic risk.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Tampons
Seventh Generation
Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator
organic cotton (tampon & applicator core); cardboard applicator
Lower-concern buy, organic cotton & MADE SAFE cert reduce PFAS risk, though brand is silent on the topic.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Lola
Organic Cotton Tampons
organic cotton (no synthetic coatings)
Lower concern, uncoated organic cotton with transparent PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Cora
Organic Tampons with Applicator
organic cotton tampon with cardboard/plastic applicator
Lower-concern choice; organic base material and MADE SAFE cert suggest thoughtful sourcing, but no explicit PFAS commitment.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More tampons grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.