75/ 100
C
OverallF57/100
Taylor of Old Bond Street Rose Shaving Cream Jar

Taylor of Old Bond Street · Shaving Cream

Taylor of Old Bond Street Rose Shaving Cream Jar

C · Moderate

Lower concern; classic shaving cream jar with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.

Verdict: BuyClassic tin-plated steel jar with established safety record; no known hazards beyond standard cosmetic ingredients. Low-risk choice for shaving cream.

Taylor of Old Bond Street Rose Shaving Cream is packaged in a traditional tin-plated steel jar with no waterproofing, grease-resistant, or nonstick coatings typical of PFAS-containing products. The cream itself contains no known PFAS Teflon-family coating, surfactants, or water-repellent treatments.

Shop Taylor of Old Bond Street on Amazon →

Material

Tin-plated steel jar with cream formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The jar is tin-plated steel, a food-grade packaging material that does not leach into aqueous or oily products under normal conditions. Tin plating creates an inert barrier between the steel substrate and the shaving cream formulation. The cream itself is a traditional soap-based emulsion; tin-plated steel jars have been the industry standard for this product category for over a century with no documented leaching incidents. This material choice is significantly safer than uncoated steel (rust risk) or plastic containers that might interact with fragrance or essential oil components.

The brand's record and disclosure

Taylor of Old Bond Street is a heritage British brand established in 1854 with a long-standing reputation in men's grooming; the product line has remained largely unchanged in formulation and packaging. The brand does not publicly disclose detailed chemical composition or third-party safety testing results on their website. No product recalls, safety warnings, or regulatory actions are on record for this shaving cream or jar. The lack of transparency is typical for traditional grooming brands and reflects market age rather than a documented safety concern.

How it compares in its category

Tin-plated steel jars are considered the safest packaging option for water-based and soap-based shaving creams, outperforming plastic containers (which may leach plasticizers) and uncoated ceramics (which can harbor bacteria in glazes). Most modern shaving cream brands have shifted to plastic pumps or tubes for convenience; Taylor's jar format is a conservative choice that prioritizes durability and material safety. The trade-off is that the product requires a brush to apply, which some users prefer but others find less convenient than aerosol or tube formats.

If you buy it

Store the jar at room temperature away from direct sunlight to preserve the metal finish and prevent any minor surface oxidation on the lid. The tin plating is durable but can chip if the jar is dropped on hard surfaces; inspect annually for small dents or rust spots on the bottom edge. Replace the product if the lid becomes severely corroded or if you notice rust discoloration, though this is rare with proper storage. The cream itself has a long shelf life (typically 2-3 years unopened) and does not require refrigeration.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Heavy metals in fragrance or colorant pigments

No recalls or testing data on record for Taylor of Old Bond Street shaving cream. Traditional rose fragrance oils are typically derived from botanical extracts and carry minimal risk of heavy metal contamination if sourced from reputable suppliers.

Possible

Formaldehyde releasers or preservative allergens

Classic soap-based shaving creams often use traditional preservative systems that may include formaldehyde-releasing agents or parabens. Taylor does not disclose a full ingredient list publicly, so specific preservative chemistry cannot be confirmed without access to the full formula.

Reported

Fragrance allergens (rose extract)

Rose fragrance is a known contact allergen in sensitive individuals; the product is marketed explicitly as rose-scented, meaning it contains either natural rose oil or synthetic rose compounds. Typical fragrance concentrations in shaving creams range from 1-3% and are considered low-risk for most users but may trigger reactions in people with fragrance sensitivity or eczema.

None known

Tin plating corrosion or leaching

Tin-plated steel does not leach into neutral or slightly alkaline aqueous formulations under normal storage conditions. No documented cases of tin leaching from cosmetic jars exist in the scientific literature or regulatory databases.

Possible

Bacterial growth in cream or on jar surface

The jar is designed for brush application, which introduces a source of water and bacteria contact with each use if the brush is not properly dried. Risk is minimal if the brush is air-dried between uses and the jar is stored with the lid closed; however, poor brush hygiene could theoretically create conditions for microbial growth in the cream itself.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shaving Cream

Baxter of California Barbe Set

Baxter of California

Barbe Set

Stainless steel, brushes, standard cosmetic packaging

B
F
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS4 flags

Lower concern, standard grooming tools with no known PFAS indicators, though brand discloses nothing.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Kiehl's Close Shavers Squadron Ultimate Razor Burn & Bump Relief

Kiehl's

Close Shavers Squadron Ultimate Razor Burn & Bump Relief

Stainless steel blade; gel/cream formula (water, glycerin, botanical extracts)

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern, standard razor and aftercare gel with no known PFAS triggers, but brand discloses nothing.

Risky category by default

Aesop Moroccan Neroli Shaving Duet with 60ml Serum and Lotion

Aesop

Moroccan Neroli Shaving Duet with 60ml Serum and Lotion

water-based serum and lotion emulsions in glass/plastic bottles

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern for this leave-on cosmetic; no special coatings flagged.

Risky category by default

More shaving cream grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.