Taylor of Old Bond Street · Shaving Cream
Mr. Taylor's Shaving Cream
Lower PFAS concern for a traditional soap-based shaving cream with no water-resistant or non-stick treatment.
Taylor of Old Bond Street's shaving cream is a rinse-off cosmetic with no disclosed water-resistant or stain-resistant treatments, the primary sources of PFAS in personal care. The brand makes no PFAS claims.
Shop Taylor of Old Bond Street on Amazon →Material
soap base, glycerin, water, fragrance
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Mr. Taylor's Shaving Cream is built on a soap base (saponified oils), glycerin (a humectant), water, and fragrance compounds. This formulation avoids synthetic polymers, silicones, and water-resistant coatings that would introduce PFAS or microplastic concerns. The soap-and-glycerin structure is inherently biodegradable and has been the standard for premium shaving creams for over a century, with minimal chemical complexity.
The brand's record and disclosure
Taylor of Old Bond Street has not published detailed ingredient sourcing, allergen disclosure, or PFAS statements on its website or packaging. The brand does not claim certifications such as EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny, or similar third-party safety endorsements. However, the company has maintained a stable product line for decades without documented safety recalls or regulatory action related to cosmetic ingredients.
How it compares in its category
This product represents the traditional end of the shaving cream market. Most mass-market aerosol shaving foams contain propellants, silicones, and often PFAS compounds for water resistance and stability. Soap-based creams like this one are lower-chemical alternatives but typically require a brush and warm water, making them less convenient than canned options. Premium soap creams occupy a smaller market segment but are considered safer from a synthetic chemical standpoint.
If you buy it
Use the product with a brush and warm water for best performance and to minimize waste. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent the soap base from drying out or developing mold. Check the product every 6-12 months for signs of separation, discoloration, or off-odor, which may indicate degradation or microbial growth. Discontinue use and replace if the cream becomes watery, develops a rancid smell, or shows visible discoloration.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens
The fragrance component is not itemized by ingredient, so individual sensitizers (such as linalool, limonene, or cinnamates) cannot be ruled out. Users with fragrance sensitivity should patch-test or contact the brand for full fragrance disclosure.
Formaldehyde releasers
No evidence of formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in soap-based shaving creams of this type. The soap base itself acts as a preservative in most formulations.
Heavy metals in pigments or colorants
Traditional soap shaving creams are typically uncolored or use minimal pigmentation. No documented cases of lead or cadmium contamination in Taylor of Old Bond Street products.
1,4-dioxane contamination
1,4-dioxane can occur as a byproduct during synthesis of certain surfactants and emulsifiers. The brand does not disclose whether testing for 1,4-dioxane is performed; this is a known risk in cosmetics with ethoxylated ingredients, though risk is generally low in soap-based formulas.
Microbial growth or mold if stored improperly
Soap and glycerin creams stored in humid bathrooms or left in standing water can develop bacterial or fungal growth over time. Proper storage and timely use reduce this risk significantly.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Shaving Cream
Baxter of California
Barbe Set
Stainless steel, brushes, standard cosmetic packaging
Lower concern, standard grooming tools with no known PFAS indicators, though brand discloses nothing.
✓Bare metal or glass, no coating at all
Kiehl's
Close Shavers Squadron Ultimate Razor Burn & Bump Relief
Stainless steel blade; gel/cream formula (water, glycerin, botanical extracts)
Lower PFAS concern, standard razor and aftercare gel with no known PFAS triggers, but brand discloses nothing.
⚠Risky category by default
Aesop
Moroccan Neroli Shaving Duet with 60ml Serum and Lotion
water-based serum and lotion emulsions in glass/plastic bottles
Lower PFAS concern for this leave-on cosmetic; no special coatings flagged.
⚠Risky category by default
More shaving cream grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.