20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
SWISSGEAR Travel Backpack

Swissgear · Backpacks

SWISSGEAR Travel Backpack

F · High PFAS

Travel backpack with water-repellent coating; PFAS content not disclosed by brand.

Verdict: SkipNylon/polyester backpack with undisclosed water-repellent coating; PFAS likely present but unconfirmed. Monitor for coating degradation and avoid heat exposure.

Swissgear does not publicly disclose PFAS use in water-repellent coating treatments. Standard water-repellent backpack coatings often contain PFAS, but verification unavailable. Moderate uncertainty without brand transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Swissgear Travel Backpacks are constructed from nylon and polyester fabrics with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") to achieve water resistance, though some manufacturers have begun transitioning to non-PFAS alternatives. Without Swissgear's explicit disclosure of their water-repellent coating chemistry, the PFAS status of this product remains unknown. The base fabrics themselves (nylon and polyester) are stable and do not leach chemicals under normal use conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

Swissgear has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of their water-repellent coating finishes or issued statements about PFAS content in their products. The brand has not pursued third-party certifications (such as Bluesign, GOTS, or similar) that would independently verify chemical safety in textile manufacturing. Without proactive transparency or certifications, it is not possible to determine whether this backpack uses legacy PFAS-based coatings or modern alternatives. Contacting the manufacturer directly for water-repellent coating specification details remains an option for consumers seeking certainty.

How it compares in its category

Most travel backpacks in this price and feature range include water-repellent treatments; few brands disclose the chemistry. Competitors such as Patagonia and some REI Co-op lines have committed to PFAS-free water resistance, while many mainstream brands remain silent. Swissgear sits in the middle market without differentiation on chemical transparency. If PFAS disclosure is a priority, backpacks with explicit non-PFAS certifications offer more confidence, though they may command a higher price.

If you buy it

Avoid exposing the backpack to sustained heat (direct sunlight during storage, high-temperature washing, or dryers), which can degrade water-repellent coating coatings and potentially release particles. Wash with cool water and mild soap by hand or on gentle cycles; avoid fabric softeners and bleach, which strip water repellency. The water-repellent coating will degrade over 3 to 5 years with regular use and occasional laundering. If water repellency becomes visibly compromised (water beading diminishes), discontinue use of the backpack or re-treat it with a non-PFAS water-repellent coating spray if available.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating degradation and particle release

Nylon and polyester water-repellent coating finishes gradually break down with laundering and heat exposure. Degraded coatings may shed microscopic particles, though ingestion or inhalation risk during backpack use is minimal; concern is primarily with washing water entering wastewater systems.

None known

Azo dyes in polyester

No recalls or public testing of Swissgear Travel Backpacks for prohibited azo dyes have been documented. Polyester textiles produced to EU or similar standards typically avoid restricted amines, but Swissgear does not disclose dyeing standards. Risk is low under normal use, as skin contact is limited and azo dyes do not leach from dry fabric.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Formaldehyde resins are occasionally used in polyester finishing for wrinkle resistance or stiffness. No formaldehyde incidents specific to Swissgear backpacks are on record. Potential off-gassing is typically minimal in outerwear compared to apparel worn directly against skin; ventilation during storage is a precaution.

Possible

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers

Nylon and polyester shed microfibers during laundering, releasing them into wastewater. This is not a direct user health hazard during backpack use but contributes to environmental microplastic pollution. Washing in cold water, using gentle cycles, and air-drying minimize fiber loss.

None known

Heavy metals or antimony in polyester dyes and stabilizers

No testing or recalls indicating heavy metal contamination in Swissgear backpacks are publicly available. Polyester production can introduce trace antimony as a catalyst, but levels in finished textiles are typically well below concern thresholds for products not worn against skin continuously.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Backpacks

Everlane Canvas Backpack

Everlane

Canvas Backpack

Canvas (cotton blend)

D
D · Elevated

Lower-concern canvas option; no PFAS trigger signals, but brand offers no transparency.

Risky category by default

Everlane The Canvas Backpack - Black OS

Everlane

The Canvas Backpack - Black OS

Canvas cotton blend

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern for uncoated canvas backpack; no water-repellent coating treatment typical of this product line.

Risky category by default

Able Carry Thirteen Daybag

Able Carry

Thirteen Daybag

Ballistic nylon, canvas, woven textile

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern; typical durable pack without inherent PFAS triggers, but brand doesn't disclose water-repellent coating treatment details.

Risky category by default

More backpacks grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.