70/ 100
C
OverallF52/100
Tampons

Sustain · Tampons

Tampons

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern for core materials, but brand discloses nothing about applicators or processing.

Verdict: BuyOrganic cotton and rayon core with no major known contaminants; brand silence on applicators and processing limits confidence but does not override material safety.

Sustain tampons use organic cotton and rayon as primary materials, inherently lower-risk fibers unlikely to contain PFAS. The brand holds MADE SAFE certification, which screens for harmful chemicals.

MADE SAFE
Shop Sustain on Amazon →

Material

organic cotton, rayon (viscose)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Sustain tampons use organic cotton and rayon (viscose) as the absorbent core. Organic cotton eliminates synthetic pesticide residues common in conventional cotton; rayon is a cellulose fiber derived from wood pulp that absorbs menstrual fluid efficiently. Neither material is known to leach heavy metals, BPA, or phthalates into the body. The absorbent structure itself does not typically shed microplastics, though applicators (plastic or cardboard) and any synthetic wrapping present separate concerns.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sustain publishes certification claims around organic cotton and sustainability but does not disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, applicator material specifications, or manufacturing process testing for contaminants. No major recalls or safety violations are on public record for this brand. The silence on processing (e.g., bleaching, rayon production controls) and applicator composition is a meaningful gap, as these steps can introduce or concentrate low-level contaminants; however, absence of disclosure is not evidence of hazard.

How it compares in its category

Sustain's organic cotton core places it above conventional tampon brands (which may carry pesticide residues and synthetic dyes) but comparable to other certified-organic alternatives like Seventh Generation or Cora. Most mainstream brands use conventional cotton and chlorine bleaching; Sustain avoids both. Rayon viscose is standard across nearly all brands and carries no established safety advantage or disadvantage versus alternatives in menstrual products, though rayon production is a heavy water and chemical user at the mill level.

If you buy it

Tampons are single-use products with no maintenance. Ensure applicator type matches your preference (plastic or cardboard) and dispose according to local guidelines; do not flush unless explicitly labeled flushable. Change tampons every 4 to 8 hours to reduce toxic shock syndrome risk, a rare but serious condition independent of brand. Organic cotton does not eliminate TSS risk; regular changeout and hygiene are the key controls.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Formaldehyde resins (processing/preservatives)

No formaldehyde-donor preservatives or cross-linking resins are documented in organic cotton or rayon tampons. Conventional cotton tampons may retain traces from pesticide or textile processing, but Sustain's organic claims suggest avoidance of this pathway. No reported cases of formaldehyde irritation from Sustain tampons.

Possible

Chlorine bleaching residues and dioxins

Sustain does not disclose bleaching method (elemental chlorine, ECF, or TCF). Even low-level dioxin formation from bleaching is theoretically possible in rayon production. Direct mucosal absorption of trace dioxins from tampons is not established as a health route, but brand transparency on bleaching would clarify risk. FDA does not mandate bleaching disclosure for tampons.

Possible

Applicator material leachables (plastic or cardboard)

Sustain does not specify applicator composition. Plastic applicators may contain BPA or phthalates depending on resin type and age; cardboard applicators avoid this but are not universally preferred. Mucosal contact is brief and applicator does not enter the body, limiting direct absorption, but material choice matters for environmental and contact dermatitis risk.

None known

Rayon viscose process chemicals (absorbed into fiber)

Rayon viscose production uses sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide; these are fully recovered in closed-loop processes at compliant mills but can leave trace sodium or sulfur compounds if mills are poorly managed. Sustain does not disclose mill certifications. No documented health effects from tampons made with standard viscose rayon.

Reported

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) from product design and use

TSS risk is independent of organic vs. conventional material and depends on absorbency, changeout frequency, and user hygiene. Sustain does not claim reduced TSS risk. All tampons carry a small absolute risk; material composition does not alter this. FDA warnings apply equally to all brands.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Tampons

Seventh Generation Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator

Seventh Generation

Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator

organic cotton (tampon & applicator core); cardboard applicator

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower-concern buy, organic cotton & MADE SAFE cert reduce PFAS risk, though brand is silent on the topic.

MADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

LOLA Organic Cotton Tampons

Lola

Organic Cotton Tampons

organic cotton (no synthetic coatings)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern, uncoated organic cotton with transparent PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE CertifiedOrganic (USDA/OCS equivalent)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Organic Tampons with Applicator

Cora

Organic Tampons with Applicator

organic cotton tampon with cardboard/plastic applicator

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; organic base material and MADE SAFE cert suggest thoughtful sourcing, but no explicit PFAS commitment.

MADE SAFE CertifiedLeaping Bunny

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More tampons grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.