Supergoop · Sunscreen
Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen SPF 40
Lower concern; mineral sunscreen formulations typically avoid PFAS, but brand transparency is absent.
Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen uses mineral (non-nano zinc oxide/titanium dioxide) UV filters, which are inherently lower-PFAS-risk than synthetic actives. However, the brand provides no public disclosure about PFAS-free formulation or third-party testing, and no independent lab data is publicly available.
Shop Supergoop on Amazon →Material
mineral UV filters, silica, talc or silicates
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Supergoop! Mineral Mattescreen uses zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide as UV filters, combined with talc or silicates for texture and matting. These mineral blockers sit on skin rather than absorbing, reducing systemic chemical exposure compared to organic sunscreen filters. The silica/talc base can present inhalation or contamination risks if the product is powdery or aerosolized during application, though typical lotion/cream formulations minimize this.
The brand's record and disclosure
Supergoop does not publicly disclose PFAS testing results or commit to PFAS-free formulations, which is a transparency gap for a premium personal care brand. The company does list some ingredients on its website and follows FDA cosmetic labeling rules, but independent testing of finished products is not published. No major recalls or established safety controversies are on record for this specific product line.
How it compares in its category
Mineral sunscreens are generally considered safer than chemical alternatives because they avoid absorption of synthetic UV filters (oxybenzone, avobenzone, etc.). Supergoop's Mattescreen positions itself as a hybrid texture product; competitors like CeraVe Mineral and Colorescience offer similar mineral bases. The matting agents may include additional silica or dimethicone, which are not regulated toxicants but vary in feel and finishability across brands.
If you buy it
Apply generously and reapply every two hours or after water exposure; mineral filters do not degrade from heat or storage like some chemical sunscreens. Avoid inhaling the powder form if the product is ever aerosolized (e.g., spray variant); stick with lotion or cream application. Check the ingredient list on packaging for talc versus mica or other silicates; talc sourcing should ideally be asbestos-tested, though cosmetic-grade talc is regulated in the US. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to maintain filter stability.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc contamination with asbestos or tremolite
Mineral sunscreens often contain talc as a matting or texture agent. US cosmetic talc is regulated and typically asbestos-free, but supply chain variability exists. Supergoop does not publicly specify talc sourcing or asbestos testing for this product.
Silica inhalation risk
If the Mattescreen is formulated with significant free silica particles (beyond bound silicates in emulsions), aerosolization during application or from loose powder could pose respiratory irritation. Lotion formulations minimize this, but product variant (cream, powder, spray) matters.
Heavy metals in mineral UV filters and colorants
Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are generally recognized as safe in cosmetics by the FDA. Supergoop has not disclosed independent testing for lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in this product; no recalls or reports of contamination are on record.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components
Supergoop Mattescreen may contain fragrance listed only as 'fragrance' under US law, which can mask over 3000 potential allergens. Sensitive skin users should patch test; no specific allergen documentation for this product is publicly available.
Dimethicone or silicone buildup on skin
Matting sunscreens often include dimethicone for finish; cumulative buildup is theoretically possible with daily use but is not established as a toxicological concern. Cleansing practices will mitigate any cosmetic residue.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Sunscreen
Goddess Garden
Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz
mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes
Lower-concern mineral sunscreen with credible PFAS-exclusion certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)
Lower PFAS concern; mineral sunscreen with third-party verification and no known fluorochemical history.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging
Lower-concern choice; mineral sunscreen + explicit PFAS-free positioning + third-party certs reduce risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More sunscreen grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.