PFAS score
Stila · Eyeliner
Stila Micro Tip Stay All Day Waterproof Liquid Eye Liner
Waterproof liquid liner carries inherent PFAS risk; Stila discloses no ingredient details or testing.
Stila's waterproof liquid eyeliner is formulated to resist water and sweat, a function historically achieved using PFAS in cosmetics. The brand does not publicly disclose its waterproofing chemistry or provide any PFAS testing or certification.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Liquid polymer film-forming cosmetic (waterproof formula, unlisted binders)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Eyeliner
MAC
Chromaline Gel - Hi-Def Cyan
gel pigment formulation (primary ingredients not publicly disclosed for proprietary reasons)
Lower concern, but cosmetic formulation opacity limits certainty.
⚠Risky category by default
Ere Perez
Jojoba Eye Pencil Gem (lilac haze)
Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (typical pencil formulation)
Lower-concern cosmetic; no PFAS risk signals identified, but brand provides no transparency on formulation or PFAS stance.
⚠Risky category by default
Ere Perez
JOJOBA EYE PENCIL Natural Black
Jojoba oil, waxes, pigments (natural eye pencil formulation)
Lower PFAS concern; natural cosmetic formulation unlikely to contain intentional PFAS, but brand transparency absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More eyeliner grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.