15/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Staub Skimming Ladle

Staub · Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets

Staub Skimming Ladle

F · High PFAS

Coating unspecified; coating composition and PFAS status unknown.

Verdict: SkipStainless steel ladle is mechanically safe; unspecified coating introduces uncertainty. Use cautiously until coating identity is confirmed by Staub.

Staub skimming ladles are stainless steel with an unspecified coating. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure, making risk assessment uncertain without lab testing.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stainless steel with unspecified coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Staub's skimming ladle is constructed from stainless steel with an undisclosed surface coating. The coating composition directly determines leaching risk and heat tolerance; without manufacturer specification, it cannot be confirmed whether the coating is ceramic, enamel, nonstick (Teflon-type coating/PFOA-based), or another polymer. Stainless steel itself is inert and safe, but coatings are the variable.

The brand's record and disclosure

Staub (owned by Zwilling) does not publicly disclose coating materials or PFAS testing for cookware products on widely accessible channels. The brand has no widely documented recalls or safety controversies specific to this ladle model. However, the lack of transparency about coating composition is a red flag for informed purchasing and suggests limited third-party verification of safety claims.

How it compares in its category

Most modern skimming ladles and slotted utensils use either uncoated stainless steel (most common, no leaching risk) or ceramic-coated variants. Staub's refusal to specify puts this product below typical disclosure standards for premium cookware brands. Competitors like Le Creuset and OXO generally provide clearer material specifications and PFAS commitments.

If you buy it

Do not use at temperatures exceeding 400F until coating identity is confirmed via Staub customer service. Hand wash rather than dishwasher to minimize coating wear. Inspect annually for chips, cracks, or flaking; discard if coating degrades. Before purchase, contact Staub directly to request written confirmation of the coating material and PFAS-free status.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Coating degradation and unknown leachate

Unspecified coating material cannot be assessed for leaching into food. Chips or wear could expose underlying metal or release coating particles. Risk increases with repeated heating and acidic foods.

Possible

Teflon-type coating/nonstick coating risk

If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (common in premium cookware), heating above the polymer's stability threshold can release fumes. Coating type is not disclosed, making heat-safety guidance impossible.

Possible

Enamel or ceramic coating cracking

If coating is vitreous enamel, thermal shock (rapid temperature change) or impact can cause crazing or flaking over time, introducing inorganic particles into food.

Reported

Lack of third-party verification

Staub does not publicly provide independent safety certifications or PFAS testing reports for this product line, limiting consumer ability to verify safety claims independently.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets

Le Creuset Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon

Le Creuset

Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon

silicone (no nonstick coating)

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; silicone spatula carries minimal risk.

Risky category by default

Le Creuset Revolution Balloon Whisk

Le Creuset

Revolution Balloon Whisk

Stainless steel wire

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Bare stainless steel whisk, no coating or nonstick surface.

Risky category by default

OXO Good Grips 3-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

Oxo Good Grips

3-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

Silicone utensil heads, thermoplastic handle

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Silicone utensils carry minimal PFAS risk inherently.

Risky category by default

More non-stick kitchen gadgets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.