65/ 100
D
OverallF41/100
Stanley IceFlow 2.0 Flip Straw Tumbler

Stanley · Insulated Drink Tumblers & Travel Mugs

Stanley IceFlow 2.0 Flip Straw Tumbler

D · Elevated

Lower concern; stainless steel body unlikely to contain PFAS, no known risk.

Verdict: SkipStainless steel body eliminates most cookware leaching risks; plastic lid components present minor concern but acceptable for cold/cool beverage use.

Stanley IceFlow tumblers are primarily stainless steel with plastic components. No evidence of PFAS-prone coatings or water-resistant treatments on core tumbler material.

The safe swap

Rambler Tumbler YETI

Yeti

Rambler Tumbler YETI

80/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stainless steel tumbler, plastic flip straw lid

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The IceFlow 2.0 tumbler body is stainless steel, which is chemically inert and does not leach metals under normal beverage storage conditions. The flip straw lid and sealing gaskets are plastic (likely polypropylene or similar thermoplastic); these components contact only cold or room-temperature liquid, which substantially reduces leaching risk compared to hot-fill scenarios. Stainless steel avoids the lead/cadmium glazing and ceramic coating concerns that apply to traditional ceramic or enameled cookware.

The brand's record and disclosure

Stanley has not made public statements specifically addressing PFAS or PFOA in their drinkware lines. The company offers no visible third-party safety certifications (NSF, FDA, etc.) for this product on major retail listings. Stanley is a legacy brand with a history in outdoor/industrial equipment; modern drinkware lines are relatively recent entries without established independent safety testing on record.

How it compares in its category

As a stainless steel tumbler, the IceFlow 2.0 avoids the leaching vulnerabilities of aluminum tumblers (which can shed metal ions at low pH) and ceramic-lined options (which carry glaze contamination risk). The plastic lid is a weak point compared to all-metal tumblers, but lid design is standard across this product class. Compared to glass or ceramic insulated cups, stainless steel is superior for durability and eliminates breakage-related hazards.

If you buy it

Use this tumbler only for cold or room-temperature beverages; do not fill with hot liquids, as heat could increase plastic component leaching. Hand wash the lid and straw rather than dishwasher to extend plastic lifespan and reduce stress cracking. Replace the lid if visible cracks, discoloration, or odor develop. Clean the straw regularly with a brush to prevent bacterial biofilm buildup, especially if used for dairy or smoothies.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Plastic lid and straw leaching (BPA/phthalates)

Plastic components in contact with beverages carry low but nonzero risk if material composition is not disclosed. Cold-liquid use minimizes migration, but identity of specific plastic resin is not stated by Stanley in available product information.

Reported

Degradation of plastic seals/gaskets over time

User reviews on multiple platforms document lid seal degradation and straw cracks after months of use; this is typical wear but increases leaching surface area and drinking-water safety if fragments are ingested or mold colonizes cracks.

None known

Stainless steel leaching (nickel, chromium)

Food-grade stainless steel (typically 18/8 or 316) is stable under beverage storage conditions and poses negligible risk of metal ion release in neutral or slightly acidic drinks at room temperature.

Reported

Bacterial growth in straw and lid crevices

Flip straw designs are difficult to fully dry and sanitize; if left wet or refilled without cleaning, straw channels can harbor mold and bacteria. This is a hygiene risk independent of material toxicity.

None known

Coating integrity of stainless steel (rare concern)

No recalls or known issues reported for Stanley IceFlow stainless steel coating degradation; electropolished food-grade stainless does not degrade under normal beverage use.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 75% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Insulated Drink Tumblers & Travel Mugs

Rambler Tumbler YETI

Yeti

Rambler Tumbler YETI

18/8 stainless steel, no coating

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Bare stainless steel tumbler, no known PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

OtterBox Elevation 20 Tumbler

OtterBox

Elevation 20 Tumbler

Stainless steel tumbler with powder coat or polyester exterior

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; stainless steel construction poses minimal risk.

Risky category by default

Stanley Stanley Quencher H2.0 Flowstate TUMBLER

Stanley

Stanley Quencher H2.0 Flowstate TUMBLER

Stainless steel body, plastic lid and base

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern. Stainless steel body poses minimal risk.

Risky category by default

More insulated drink tumblers & travel mugs grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.