Srixon · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Srixon Men's All Weather Golf Glove
All-weather golf gloves likely use water-repellent coating treatments; PFAS risk uncertain without disclosure.
All-weather golf gloves typically receive water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes that may contain PFAS. Srixon provides no public disclosure of treatment chemistry or PFAS avoidance.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather/synthetic with water-resistant treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Srixon All Weather Golf Gloves combine leather (typically goat or cabretta leather for grip) with synthetic backing and a water-resistant surface treatment. The water-repellency is the critical component: most "all-weather" golf gloves use durable water-resistant (water-repellent coating) finishes, which historically relied on PFAS chemistry, though some manufacturers have shifted to non-PFAS alternatives. Srixon does not publicly disclose which water-repellent coating chemistry they use, leaving the PFAS status uncertain.
The brand's record and disclosure
Srixon (owned by Dunlop Sports) does not maintain published transparency regarding chemical treatments in apparel or use of PFAS/non-PFAS water-repellent coating finishes. No major product recalls or toxicity incidents are on record for this glove line. The brand has not pursued certifications like Oeko-Tex (which limits harmful chemicals) or GOTS for this product category, suggesting lower priority on chemical disclosure.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves vary widely in water-repellent coating approach; premium brands (e.g., some Titleist lines, FootJoy synthetic options) increasingly market PFAS-free treatments or are transparent about chemistry. Mid-tier offerings like Srixon typically match industry baseline, which remains mixed: some use newer non-PFAS technologies, others retain traditional PFAS-based water-repellent coating. Without Srixon's disclosure, this glove cannot be distinguished from its peers on chemical grounds.
If you buy it
Wash the glove by hand with mild soap and lukewarm water before first use to remove any loose finish or dyes; air-dry away from direct heat or sunlight, which can degrade both leather and synthetic components. Inspect seams and leather surface monthly for cracking or loss of water resistance; replace when water no longer beads on the surface (typically 1-2 seasons of regular use). Store in a cool, dry place and avoid prolonged exposure to chlorine pools or harsh detergents, which accelerate coating breakdown.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in durable water-resistant (water-repellent coating) finishes
All-weather golf gloves almost universally use water-repellent coating treatments; Srixon provides no public disclosure of whether their formulation uses legacy PFAS chemistry or newer alternatives. Without brand confirmation, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out.
Azo dyes in synthetic or leather coloring
No recalls or reports of azo-dye toxicity specific to Srixon golf gloves. Leather tanning and synthetic dyeing can use azo compounds, but exposure risk through skin contact on a glove is minimal unless the product sheds dye visibly (not documented for this line).
Heavy metals in leather tanning or pigments
Leather tanning historically used chromium; modern tanneries use controlled processes. No specific contamination data is available for Srixon's leather sourcing. Chromium exposure through transient skin contact on a glove is considered negligible.
Formaldehyde resins in synthetic backing or adhesives
Golf gloves typically do not require formaldehyde-releasing resins; fabric backing and stitching adhesives in this product are not known to emit formaldehyde at concerning levels, but Srixon provides no materials specification sheet.
Degradation of water-resistant coating over time
All water-repellent coating treatments degrade with washing and UV exposure. As the coating breaks down, the glove loses water repellency and may require replacement after 1-2 seasons. This is functional decline rather than toxicity risk, but affects product lifespan and value.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.