Srixon · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Srixon 2021 All Weather Golf Glove (6-Pack) - Right Hand / Medium
Golf gloves likely treated for water resistance; PFAS status undisclosed by Srixon.
Golf gloves typically feature water-repellent coatings that may contain PFAS. Srixon provides no public disclosure on PFAS content or treatment chemicals used in this product.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Synthetic leather or polyurethane with water-repellent treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This glove is constructed from synthetic leather or polyurethane, not animal hide, which avoids tanning chemical residues but introduces polymer stability concerns. The water-repellent finish is the critical unknown: such treatments typically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS-family chemicals) to achieve durable water-shedding on fabric, though non-fluorinated alternatives exist. Polyurethane itself is stable during normal wear, but degradation over years can release breakdown products, and the coating's durability determines how long protection lasts before re-treatment or disposal becomes necessary.
The brand's record and disclosure
Srixon (owned by Dunlop Sports) does not publicly disclose water-repellent chemistry or provide third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign) for its gloves. The company has no known statements acknowledging PFAS use, substitution strategies, or phase-out commitments in apparel. Industry-wide, golf equipment makers lag behind outdoor clothing brands in transparency; Srixon's silence mirrors this pattern and limits consumer ability to verify safer formulations.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves occupy a niche with fewer safety standards than general apparel. Most competitors (Callaway, TaylorMade, Titleist) similarly decline to disclose water-repellent treatment chemistry. Synthetic leather gloves dominate the market; leather alternatives exist but are more expensive and less durable in wet conditions. This product sits at the mainstream center: no worse than competitors, but no transparency advantage either.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to slow polyurethane degradation. Rinse with cool water after salt-water use (coast play) to reduce corrosive stress on coatings. Replace when grip texture flattens or seams separate, typically after 1-2 seasons of regular play. Avoid machine washing or high heat drying, which accelerate coating failure and can release volatile compounds; hand wash with mild soap and air dry instead.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Water-repellent treatment composition (likely PFAS)
Srixon does not disclose whether the water-resistant finish uses PFAS or PFAS-free alternatives. Polyurethane synthetic leather is commonly treated with fluorinated compounds for durability; this product provides no confirmation of safer chemistry.
Polyurethane degradation and off-gassing
No reported cases of harmful VOC release from Srixon golf gloves during normal use. However, polyurethane coatings can degrade over years, especially with sweat, heat, and UV exposure; degradation products are not characterized for this specific glove.
Azo dyes and colorant safety
Srixon does not publish dye or pigment source data. Synthetic leather gloves typically use azo or other synthetic dyes; no restrictions on restricted azo compounds have been reported for this brand, but certification data is unavailable.
Heavy metals in pigments or coatings
No recalls or safety alerts exist for lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in Srixon gloves. Synthetic leather pigments and polyurethane binders are not typically high-risk sources, but brand testing records are not public.
Skin sensitization from residual chemicals
No documented cases of dermatitis or allergic reactions linked to this glove model. However, residual solvents, uncrosslinked polyurethane oligomers, or dye impurities can theoretically irritate sensitive skin; pre-wearing hand-washing may reduce risk.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.