75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Aussie Ultra Wonder Daily Mist

Spray Lotion · Hair Spray

Aussie Ultra Wonder Daily Mist

C · Moderate

Spray lotion with lower PFAS concern; no waterproofing agents typical.

Verdict: BuyWater-based spray lotion with glycerin and botanicals; no established heavy metals or formaldehyde issues; lower PFAS profile typical for non-waterproofing sprays.

Aussie Ultra Wonder Daily Mist is a cosmetic spray lotion without known waterproofing or stain-resistant treatments that typically require PFAS. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure, but formulation appears lower risk.

Shop Spray Lotion on Amazon →

Material

Water, glycerin, botanical extracts, humectants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Aussie Ultra Wonder Daily Mist is a water-based spray lotion, meaning its primary solvent is water rather than volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or silicones. Glycerin acts as a humectant to draw moisture into hair, while botanical extracts are marketing components with minimal safety concern at typical use levels. The absence of film-forming polymers or waterproofing silicones means this product carries a lower inherent risk profile for chemical accumulation compared to heavy-hold sprays or waterproofing products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Aussie is owned by Coty Inc., a major beauty conglomerate. The brand does not publicly disclose fragrance allergen lists, preservative types, or PFAS testing results, which is standard opacity for mainstream hair care brands. No recalls or regulatory safety actions specific to Aussie spray products are on record in FDA or CPSC databases. Ingredient disclosure follows standard cosmetic labeling rules but lacks third-party certification (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny).

How it compares in its category

Spray lotions sit in the lighter end of styling products, positioned between daily conditioners and heavy-hold sprays. Most competitors (like SheaMoisture, Cantu, or salon brands) use similar water-glycerin bases. Aussie's lack of specialty claims (no heat protection, no UV filters) means it avoids the additives that sometimes trigger concern; however, it also offers less functional differentiation than premium alternatives.

If you buy it

Apply to damp hair and avoid spraying directly into eyes or mouth. The product contains fragrance; if you have fragrance sensitivity or contact dermatitis, patch-test first on a small scalp area. Store below 25C (77F) to prevent preservative degradation, though water-based sprays are generally stable. Discard if separation, odor change, or discoloration appears; standard shelf life is 12-24 months after opening.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Aussie lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without breaking down individual components (e.g., limonene, linalool). While fragrance-induced contact dermatitis is not common in spray lotions, it is a documented risk in hair products, especially with repeated scalp contact.

Possible

Preservative-related irritation or sensitivity

Water-based formulas require preservatives to prevent bacterial and fungal growth. Aussie does not publicly specify which preservative system is used. Common preservatives in hair sprays (parabens, phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone) can trigger scalp irritation in sensitive individuals.

None known

Heavy metals in botanical extracts or colorants

No recalls or regulatory findings link Aussie spray products to lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination from botanical ingredients. However, the brand provides no independent testing data on botanical extract sourcing or heavy metal screening.

None known

Microplastic or polymer accumulation

This water-based spray lotion does not appear to contain microbeads or intentional microplastics. Spray lotions in this category rarely contain polymers large enough to be classified as microplastics.

None known

Propellant safety (if aerosol)

If this product is sold in aerosol form, propellants are typically isobutane, propane, or compressed air. These carry no established toxicity at use levels but should not be inhaled deliberately. Product format (pump vs. aerosol) should be confirmed on packaging.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More hair spray grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.