50/ 100
F
OverallF24/100
Stealth Filler Spool

Spiderwire · Fishing Line & Fishing Tackle

Stealth Filler Spool

F · High PFAS

Unknown coating; insufficient public data to assess PFAS risk.

Verdict: SkipFishing line carries unknown PFAS coating risk; monofilament itself stable in typical use, but coating transparency and brand silence warrant cautious handling.

Spiderwire Stealth Filler Spool lacks disclosed material info. Fishing line coatings often use Teflon-family coating; brand transparency needed.

The safe swap

Shakespeare Sportfisher Fishing Mono filament Line

Shakespeare

Shakespeare Sportfisher Fishing Mono filament Line

85/100 safety

B

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Monofilament fishing line, coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Unknown / proprietary coating

Proprietary coating with no disclosed chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spiderwire Stealth Filler Spool is monofilament fishing line, typically nylon (polyamide) or copolymer core. The 'Stealth' designation indicates an applied coating to reduce visibility underwater, but Spiderwire does not publicly specify the coating chemistry. Monofilament itself is chemically stable during normal fishing use, but applied surface coatings (especially those reducing visibility or adding strength) are the primary concern for leachables or intentional additives like PFAS-based water repellents. The unspecified coating formulation creates a gap in safety transparency.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spiderwire (owned by Berkley, a major fishing tackle manufacturer) has not publicly disclosed coating ingredients, manufacturing certifications, or PFAS testing for its line products. The brand has no known environmental or safety controversies specific to monofilament composition, but the silence on coating formulation is consistent with the fishing industry's general lack of material transparency. No third-party certifications (such as eco-label or toxicological vetting) are available for this product line.

How it compares in its category

Monofilament fishing line is inherently safer than braided alternatives during use because it does not fragment into microfibers as readily. However, most branded monofilament (Spiderwire, Berkley, Trilene, etc.) relies on proprietary coatings whose formulations remain proprietary and untested publicly. Budget and specialty-grade monofilament often omits added coatings, reducing coating-related uncertainty but potentially offering less casting performance. Spiderwire occupies the mid-to-premium segment where coating claims drive market positioning but ingredient secrecy is industry norm.

If you buy it

Store spools in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent coating degradation and UV-induced leaching. Avoid heating or boiling monofilament; while nylon itself has a high melting point, applied coatings may leach or decompose if exposed to sustained heat above 60-70°C (140-160°F). Replace line annually or after heavy use, as both nylon embrittlement and coating wear increase breakage risk and potential microfiber shedding. Dispose of spent line properly (specialized tackle recycling or landfill, never waterways) to avoid entanglement hazards to wildlife.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Unspecified coating composition and potential leachables

Spiderwire does not publish coating ingredients for Stealth line. Coatings designed to reduce visibility underwater may contain heavy metals (titanium dioxide, lead chromate alternatives) or synthetic additives with unknown leaching behavior in freshwater or saltwater environments.

Possible

Microplastic and microfiber release

Monofilament naturally fragments and sheds microfibers during handling, casting, and degradation. Coating wear accelerates this process. While not unique to Spiderwire, the lack of data on coating durability and shed particle composition leaves risk unquantified.

Reported

Nylon degradation and embrittlement over time

Monofilament nylon becomes brittle with age, UV exposure, and thermal stress. Spiderwire Stealth spools stored in warm or sunlit conditions will degrade faster, increasing breakage and microfiber release. This is inherent to the material class, not brand-specific.

Possible

Heavy metal additives in visibility-reducing coatings

Coatings marketed as 'Stealth' or low-visibility often use opacity agents or colorants that may include cadmium, lead, or antimony compounds. Without ingredient disclosure, this risk cannot be ruled out for this product.

Possible

Aquatic toxicity from coating leachates

Fishing line is used in water environments where any coating leachate would enter the ecosystem directly. The unknown composition of Spiderwire's coating means aquatic impact is unassessed and not publicly documented.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Fishing Line & Fishing Tackle

Shakespeare Sportfisher Fishing Mono filament Line

Shakespeare

Sportfisher Fishing Mono filament Line

Monofilament nylon fishing line

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Nylon monofilament unlikely to contain PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

825 Yards of Shakespeare Sigma Premium Monofilament 12 LB Test Clear Blue Fluorescent Fishing Line / 12 Pound Shakespear

Shakespeare

825 Yards of Shakespeare Sigma Premium Monofilament 12 LB Test Clear Blue Fluorescent Fishing Line / 12 Pound Shakespear

Nylon monofilament fishing line

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Nylon monofilament unlikely to contain PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Sealed Shakespeare Monofilament Nylon Fishing Line 700 Yds K-mart

Shakespeare

Sealed Shakespeare Monofilament Nylon Fishing Line 700 Yds K-mart

Nylon monofilament fishing line

B
F
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Bare nylon monofilament unlikely to contain PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More fishing line & fishing tackle grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.