30/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
SmashBox Photo Finish Endurance Breathable Setting Spray

Smashbox · Beauty Primers & Setting Sprays

SmashBox Photo Finish Endurance Breathable Setting Spray

F · High PFAS

Skip until PFAS content disclosed; waterproof cosmetics commonly contain PFAS.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof setting spray with undisclosed PFAS status; other hazard profile typical for category. Buy only if PFAS transparency improves or you accept waterproof cosmetics' PFAS risk.

Smashbox does not disclose PFAS status for this product. Waterproofing and breathable coating technology in setting sprays often relies on PFAS-based ingredients to achieve durability and moisture resistance. No third-party verification available.

The safe swap

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

75/100 safety

C

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its C.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid setting spray with waterproofing and breathable film technology

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Photo Finish Endurance is a liquid spray formulation designed to create a breathable film that locks makeup in place while claiming water resistance. The 'breathable' and 'waterproof' claims suggest a synthetic polymer matrix, likely acrylate or silicone-based, with volatile solvents (typically alcohol or hydrocarbons) to deliver the spray. Water-resistant cosmetic films commonly contain PFAS to repel moisture, though Smashbox has not disclosed whether this product contains PFOA, PFOS, or other fluorinated compounds. The 'endurance' designation implies longer wear, raising questions about film-forming polymer safety at extended skin contact.

The brand's record and disclosure

Smashbox (owned by Estee Lauder Companies) does not publicly disclose PFAS presence or absence in its products and has no published PFAS elimination timeline. The brand lists ingredients on packaging and websites but does not separately identify fluorinated polymers or other PFAS precursors in marketing materials. No major recalls or safety actions specific to this product line are on record, but the parent company has faced no public commitment to phase out PFAS in waterproof cosmetics, unlike some competitors.

How it compares in its category

Setting sprays occupy a middle ground in cosmetic hazard risk. This product's waterproof claim places it in a higher-PFAS-risk subcategory than non-waterproof alternatives (e.g., Ben Nye Final Seal or MAC Fix+). Competitors like Urban Decay All Nighter have similar undisclosed PFAS status, while brands like Tatcha have begun transparency on PFAS content or pursued alternatives. No major setting spray brand currently offers PFAS-free waterproof formulations widely available, making this a category-wide disclosure gap.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated area to minimize inhalation of spray particles and volatile solvents; avoid direct eye contact and do not spray near face if possible. Store upright at room temperature away from heat or direct sunlight, as propellant pressure and solvent stability are temperature-sensitive. Replace every 12 months if used regularly, or sooner if you notice separation, clogging, or reduced spray performance. Do not use on broken or irritated skin, and patch-test if you have sensitive skin or fragrance sensitivities, as setting sprays often contain undisclosed fragrance compounds.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

1,4-dioxane (solvent contaminant)

Spray formulations often contain ethoxylated ingredients or cyclic ethers that may be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Smashbox does not publicly disclose testing for this contaminant in this product.

Likely

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and inhalation risk

Setting sprays rely on alcohol or hydrocarbon solvents to deliver the film-forming polymer. Repeated spraying in poorly ventilated spaces may expose users to respiratory irritation or accumulation of solvents, particularly with the 'endurance' formulation's higher polymer load.

Reported

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed ingredients

Like most Smashbox cosmetics, this product contains fragrance listed as a single ingredient rather than broken down into specific components. Fragrance mixes commonly cause contact dermatitis or sensitization, and users cannot identify specific allergens.

Possible

Polymer film residue on skin and occlusion

Breathable film-forming polymers are designed to coat skin and may not fully remove with standard cleansing, potentially causing occlusion or irritation with extended wear, especially in warm or humid conditions.

Likely

PFAS in waterproof formulations (category risk)

Waterproof cosmetics almost universally contain PFAS or PFAS-precursor compounds to achieve water repellency. Smashbox's silence on this ingredient is typical for the brand and the industry, but creates uncertainty about dermal and systemic exposure.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 40% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Beauty Primers & Setting Sprays

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

liquid spray formulation, water and glycerin base

C
D
PFASAll
C · Moderate2 flags

Lower concern. Spray cosmetic with no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Estee Lauder The Smoother Universal Perfecting Primer

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder The Smoother Universal Perfecting Primer

Silicone, glycerin, water, pigments

C
D
PFASAll
C · Moderate2 flags

Liquid cosmetic primer with lower PFAS concern, no red flags identified.

Risky category by default

Estee Lauder The Mattifier Shine Control Perfecting Primer and Finisher

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder The Mattifier Shine Control Perfecting Primer and Finisher

silicones, talc, pigments, waxes

C
C
PFASAll
C · Moderate1 flag

Lower concern; cosmetic primer with no known PFAS-prone ingredients.

Risky category by default

More beauty primers & setting sprays grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.