75/ 100
C
OverallF59/100
Shea Moisture Coconut & Hibiscus Curl & Shine Shampoo

SheaMoisture · Shampoo

Shea Moisture Coconut & Hibiscus Curl & Shine Shampoo

C · Moderate

Lower-concern buy, no PFAS-prone application or treatments typical for this product category.

Verdict: BuyAqueous shampoo with no heat application, minimal chemical hazard record, and established brand transparency. Safe for routine use.

SheaMoisture Coconut & Hibiscus is a rinse-off liquid shampoo with no water-repellency, non-stick coating, or stain-resistance requirements that would typically demand PFAS.

Shop SheaMoisture on Amazon →

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (water, cleansers, plant extracts)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a water-based shampoo formulation combining surfactants (cleansing agents), plant extracts (coconut oil, hibiscus), and humectants in liquid suspension. Unlike bar soaps or rinse-off treatments, shampoos are designed for brief skin/scalp contact before thorough rinsing, which significantly reduces exposure windows for any residual chemicals. The coconut and hibiscus are functional ingredients (conditioning, fragrance) rather than concerns; aqueous formulations do not concentrate heavy metals or persistent chemicals the way powders or concentrated oils can.

The brand's record and disclosure

SheaMoisture has published ingredient lists and maintains transparency around product formulations on its website and packaging. The brand does not claim organic certification for this specific line, but sources plant materials from sustainable suppliers and has no documented recalls or regulatory violations for this shampoo. The company has not publicly released PFAS testing data (silent stance), which is typical for the personal care industry; most mainstream shampoos remain untested for PFAS, so absence of disclosure is not unusual and reflects broader industry practice rather than a red flag.

How it compares in its category

This shampoo falls into the mainstream sulfate-free, plant-extract category, similar to many mid-market brands. It avoids some older formulation concerns (like certain legacy preservatives), though it is not certified organic, cruelty-free audited, or exceptionally minimal in ingredient count compared to boutique alternatives. For the price point and availability, it occupies a middle ground: safer than many 2000s-era formulations, but not as stripped-down as ultra-minimal brands.

If you buy it

Use as directed: wet hair, apply, lather, rinse thoroughly with water within 1-2 minutes to minimize any contact time. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight; shampoo bottles are not designed to withstand temperatures above 40-45°C, and heat can degrade preservatives. No special maintenance required beyond keeping the cap sealed. Replace when empty or if you notice separation, odor change, or visible discoloration, which would signal preservative breakdown.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Formaldehyde releasers in preservatives

Aqueous shampoos often use preservatives like diazolidinyl urea or imidazolidinyl urea, which can slowly release formaldehyde in storage. No specific preservative system has been published for this product; rinsing nature of use minimizes absorption risk even if present, but sensitive scalps may react.

Possible

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

The product lists 'fragrance' as a general ingredient, which can include 30+ chemicals not individually named. Hibiscus and coconut are natural fragrance bases, but synthetic amplifiers may be present. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or scalp sensitivity should conduct a patch test or review the full ingredient list on the product or brand website.

Possible

1,4-dioxane contamination in surfactants

Surfactants used in rinse-off products may be synthesized with processes that leave trace 1,4-dioxane (a probable carcinogen). Industry-wide testing shows levels typically below 10 ppm in finished shampoos, and rinsing removes most exposure; no specific testing for this product is publicly available.

Possible

Contact dermatitis or scalp irritation from plant extracts

Coconut oil and hibiscus extracts are natural allergens for some individuals, particularly those with coconut allergy or sensitive scalp conditions. Plant materials are not inherently safer than synthetic alternatives; patch testing on a small scalp area before full use is recommended for sensitive users.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or colorants

This shampoo contains no added colorants or pigments listed in its standard formulation. Plant extracts (hibiscus, coconut) may contain trace minerals, but aqueous rinse-off products do not concentrate metals in a way that poses measurable risk from occasional use.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 82% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

Puracy

Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.