PFAS score
Sealskinz · Winter Gloves
Womens Sealskinz Acle Water Repellent Nano Fleece Glove
Skip, water-repellent coating unspecified; Sealskinz does not disclose PFAS status.
Sealskinz Acle gloves use a 'nano' water-repellent treatment on polyester fleece, but the brand provides no details on the coating chemistry or PFAS content. Sealskinz has not published PFAS-free certifications or third-party verification.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Polyester fleece with water-repellent nano coating (composition unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
Vague safety claims only
Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Winter Gloves
Patagonia
Synchilla Gloves
Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed
Lower PFAS concern for core fleece; verify any water-repellent finish separately with Patagonia.
⚠Risky category by default
Icebreaker
Quantum Gloves
Merino wool blend, likely uncoated or standard knit
Lower-concern baseline for wool gloves; no known PFAS triggers, but Icebreaker has not publicly disclosed water-repellent coating treatment details.
⚠Risky category by default
Icebreaker
260 Tech Glove Liner
Merino wool blend, likely polyester base
Lower PFAS concern; natural fiber liner without known water-resistant treatment, but brand transparency is absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More winter gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.