20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Ultra-Sil Daypack - Atoll Blue

Sea to Summit · Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Ultra-Sil Daypack - Atoll Blue

F · High PFAS

Silicone daypack; PFAS risk unclear without material disclosure.

Verdict: SkipSilicone-coated daypack with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment and silent PFAS stance; safe for typical use but transparency gap warrants cautious approach.

Sea to Summit's Ultra-Sil line uses silicone-coated nylon. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure. Silicone itself is lower concern, but water-repellent treatment details remain unstated.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Silicone-coated fabric (likely water-repellent coating treatment)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Ultra-Sil Daypack uses silicone-coated nylon or polyester fabric, which provides water resistance without relying on traditional fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatments. Silicone itself is generally considered chemically inert and does not off-gas volatile compounds at normal temperatures. However, Sea to Summit has not publicly disclosed whether the water-repellent coating treatment on this specific product contains PFAS, what alternative chemistry is used, or whether the silicone coating contains any additives (such as antimony catalysts in polyester) that could migrate under stress or abrasion.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sea to Summit does not maintain a public PFAS disclosure policy or sustainability statement specifically addressing water-repellent coating chemistry in their daypack line. The brand has not voluntarily committed to PFAS-free manufacturing or published third-party testing results for water-resistant coatings. This silence is notable given that outdoor apparel companies like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have made explicit PFAS commitments; the absence of such disclosure suggests either use of PFAS-based treatments or simply lack of transparency rather than proven safety.

How it compares in its category

Most lightweight daypacks in this price range use either traditional fluorocarbon water-repellent coating (Teflon-based, persistent PFAS) or silicone coatings. Silicone-coated alternatives from competing brands (e.g., Zpacks, some Hyperlite models) face the same disclosure gap. Sea to Summit's approach is neither better nor worse than category norms, but it sits in the middle tier of transparency, not as transparent as brands with explicit PFAS policies, and not as cheap as fully uncoated options that require rewaxing or sealing.

If you buy it

The daypack is safe for normal use (hiking, commuting, travel); silicone coatings do not off-gas significantly and do not leach under dry conditions. Avoid machine washing, which can accelerate any coating degradation; hand wash with mild soap and air dry. Inspect the seams and coating annually for cracking or peeling; once the waterproof layer fails substantially, consider replacement rather than repair, as recoating is difficult and may not restore performance. Store in a cool, dry place to minimize UV and thermal stress on the silicone layer.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-repellent coating treatment (water-repellent coating)

Sea to Summit has not disclosed whether the water-repellent coating applied to this daypack's silicone-coated fabric contains PFAS. Silicone coating itself does not inherently require PFAS, but water-repellent coating finishes commonly do unless explicitly formulated otherwise. Without material testing or brand confirmation, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out.

Possible

Coating degradation and microplastic release

Silicone coatings can crack, peel, or degrade over 3-5 years of heavy use, particularly at stress points (seams, folds, straps). Fragments shed during washing or wear could theoretically enter waterways, though the quantity from a single daypack is negligible. Normal hand washing minimizes this risk.

None known

Antimony in polyester substrate

If the base fabric is polyester (likely), it may contain antimony as a polymerization catalyst. Antimony leaching from fabric is not established as a hazard at skin contact, and no recalls or reports specific to Sea to Summit daypacks exist. This is a category-level concern with no brand-specific evidence.

None known

Formaldehyde-based fabric finishes (sizing or anti-wrinkle)

Lightweight nylon and polyester fabrics occasionally use formaldehyde-containing sizing or finishing agents. No specific testing or complaints have been reported for Ultra-Sil products, and silicone coating may encapsulate such residues. First wash recommended to reduce any residual finish.

None known

Fragrance or dye allergens

Atoll Blue colorant and any applied water-resistant treatments are unlikely to trigger contact dermatitis in typical use, but no material safety data sheet is publicly available for this specific product. Individuals with sensitive skin should test with a patch of fabric before extended wear.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Granite Gear Wrought Iron Food Pack

Granite Gear

Wrought Iron Food Pack

nylon fabric pack, likely uncoated or minimally treated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Food pack likely lower concern; confirm no water-repellent coating with brand.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.