20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Big River Dry Backpack

Sea to Summit · Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Big River Dry Backpack

F · High PFAS

water-repellent coating unknown; Sea to Summit does not disclose PFAS status.

Verdict: SkipPolyester ripstop with unknown water-repellent coating chemistry and silent brand disclosure on PFAS; no other major hazards documented, but durability of coating and care practices matter.

Sea to Summit does not publicly disclose PFAS or water-repellent coating chemistry for this backpack. Waterproof outdoor gear often uses legacy PFAS treatments; contact brand for specific details on coating formulation.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester ripstop with water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Big River uses polyester ripstop fabric, a tightly woven synthetic that resists tearing and is inherently water-resistant to some degree. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment is a topical coating applied to enhance water shedding; this is where PFAS chemistry typically enters outdoor gear, though Sea to Summit has not publicly specified whether their water-repellent coating uses fluorinated compounds. Polyester itself does not off-gas formaldehyde or other volatile organics in normal use, making the water-repellent coating treatment the primary chemical concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sea to Summit has not made public commitments to PFAS-free manufacturing or disclosed their water-repellent coating supplier chemistry. The brand operates in the outdoor-gear sector where PFAS use remains common but increasingly scrutinized. No major recalls or documented chemical safety incidents specific to this backpack are on record. Their silence on water-repellent coating composition is not uncommon in the industry, but represents a gap in transparency relative to brands that have committed to PFAS alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Most polyester ripstop backpacks in this price range use fluorinated water-repellent coating as standard; some competitors (e.g., certain Patagonia and Arc'teryx models) now offer PFAS-free alternatives, though at higher cost. The Big River's construction and durability are typical for mid-range outdoor packs. Without explicit PFAS-free certification, it sits in the conventional middle of the market rather than the growing eco-conscious segment.

If you buy it

Wash the backpack in cool water with mild detergent; avoid machine drying or heat, which can degrade the water-repellent coating faster. The water-repellent coating will gradually wear with use and washings, typically lasting 1-3 years before water beading noticeably diminishes. Do not use waterproofing sprays on top unless verified PFAS-free, as this can layer unknown chemicals. Store dry in a cool place; mildew from trapped moisture is a greater practical risk than the coating itself.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

water-repellent coating degradation and durability

The fluorinated or alternative water-repellent coating treatment will degrade with washing and UV exposure; as it breaks down, water repellency declines and users may reapply treatments, potentially introducing additional chemical exposure or opting for untested alternatives.

None known

Azo dyes in polyester

No specific azo dye concerns have been reported for Sea to Summit backpacks. Standard polyester fabric typically uses azo dyes, but conversion to non-azo is uncommon in outdoor ripstop and no testing data for this model is available.

None known

Antimony in polyester substrate

Antimony oxide is occasionally used as a catalyst in polyester manufacturing but is not a documented concern for finished fabric items under normal use. No specific testing or complaints for this product exist.

None known

Formaldehyde in fabric finishes

Polyester ripstop does not require formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance as cotton does. No formaldehyde hazard is expected from this product type.

Possible

Microplastic shedding from wear

Synthetic ripstop fabrics can shed microfibers during washing and use, contributing to waterborne microplastic pollution. This is an environmental concern rather than direct user toxicity, but relevant to informed purchase.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Granite Gear Wrought Iron Food Pack

Granite Gear

Wrought Iron Food Pack

nylon fabric pack, likely uncoated or minimally treated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Food pack likely lower concern; confirm no water-repellent coating with brand.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.