85/ 100
B
OverallC73/100
RTIC 20 oz Tumbler

RTIC · Insulated Drink Tumblers

RTIC 20 oz Tumbler

B · Low PFAS

Lower concern. Stainless steel tumbler unlikely to contain PFAS.

Verdict: BuyStainless steel construction with no established coating hazards; lower PFAS concern and no major brand safety controversies on record.

RTIC 20 oz tumblers are stainless steel with vacuum insulation, materials inherently unlikely to require PFAS. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure, but product design presents minimal PFAS risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Stainless steel exterior, vacuum-insulated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The RTIC 20 oz tumbler uses 18/8 food-grade stainless steel (the exterior shell) with a vacuum-insulated interior, typically a stainless steel inner wall or similar inert material. Stainless steel is chemically stable and does not leach heavy metals or break down into microplastics under normal use or repeated dishwashing. The vacuum seal itself contains no known hazardous gases; it is simply air at low pressure.

The brand's record and disclosure

RTIC (Rugged Thermal Insulated Containers) does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or third-party certifications (e.g., BPA-free claims, heavy metal testing). The brand maintains a largely silent stance on chemical compliance beyond standard food-contact material compliance. No major recalls or safety controversies involving the 20 oz tumbler have been documented in public records or media. The product is sold as a general-purpose drinkware item without premium certification.

How it compares in its category

Vacuum-insulated tumblers in this price range (RTIC, Yeti, Ozark Trail) share similar stainless steel construction and pose comparable hazard profiles. RTIC tumblers lack the third-party transparency some competitors offer (e.g., some Yeti products cite NSF certification); however, the core material risk is equivalent. Stainless steel tumbler hazards are overall lower than those of insulated plastic drinkware or ceramic-coated alternatives.

If you buy it

Hand-wash or use gentle dishwasher cycles to preserve any interior coating and seals over time. Do not expose to extreme heat (boiling water is safe, but prolonged heating above 60°C is unnecessary and may degrade gaskets). Replace the tumbler if the seal fails, allowing moisture into the vacuum layer, as this indicates structural compromise. Store dry when not in use to prevent bacterial growth in the seal area.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Stainless steel leaching (chromium, nickel)

18/8 food-grade stainless steel is highly resistant to corrosion and does not leach detectable chromium or nickel under normal beverage storage. No recalls or reports of leaching from RTIC tumblers are on record.

Possible

Gasket/seal degradation and off-gassing

The vacuum tumbler's rubber gaskets and seals (typically silicone or synthetic rubber) can degrade with age and repeated hot-water exposure. Off-gassing of volatile organics from degraded seals is theoretically possible but uncommon in stainless steel tumblers; replacement seals/lids are readily available.

Possible

Bacterial growth in seal cavities

Water or beverage residue trapped in the lid gasket or seal area can harbor bacteria if the tumbler is not dried promptly after cleaning. This is a maintenance issue, not a material hazard, and is mitigated by regular hand-drying and air circulation.

Possible

Interior coating unknown

RTIC does not disclose whether the inner stainless steel surface has a coating (e.g., epoxy, food-grade lacquer). If a coating is present, its composition is not publicly documented, though major hazards (lead, cadmium) are unlikely in a US-marketed food-contact product.

None known

Microplastics from lid or interior wear

The tumbler body is stainless steel and will not shed microplastics. The plastic lid (if included) is a secondary component and is not designed to contact hot liquids for extended periods; no reports of plastic degradation or microplastic shedding from RTIC lids are on record.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Insulated Drink Tumblers

Reduce Halo Tumbler

Reduce

Halo Tumbler

Stainless steel and plastic lid

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern tumbler; stainless steel is inherently PFAS-safe.

Naturally PFAS-free material

To Go Tumbler

Cuppa

To Go Tumbler

Stainless steel with plastic lid

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Standard tumbler with no known PFAS risks.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Klean Kanteen Steel Pint

Klean Kanteen

Steel Pint

18/8 stainless steel, bare metal

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern. Bare stainless steel container, no coatings.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

More insulated drink tumblers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.