RMS Beauty Uncovered · Foundation
RMS Beauty W-C-13745 0.2 oz UN Cover Up-000, Snow whites
Lower concern, mineral cream cosmetics rarely contain PFAS, but no public disclosure confirms it.
RMS Beauty's W-C-13745 is a cream/powder concealer composed of conventional mineral and pigment bases. No public evidence links RMS Beauty to PFAS use in cosmetics, and the simple formulation (talc, mica, iron oxides) carries lower inherent risk than waterproofed or water-resistant formulas.
Shop RMS Beauty Uncovered on Amazon →Material
talc, mica, iron oxides, pigments (cream/powder cosmetic)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
RMS Beauty UN Cover Up is a talc-based cream foundation containing mica, iron oxides, and synthetic pigments. Talc in cosmetics has been scrutinized for asbestos contamination risk, though modern cosmetic-grade talc is regulated for purity in most markets. The mica and iron oxides are inert mineral pigments with minimal toxicity concerns. Cream formulations like this one are less prone to aerosolization than powders, reducing inhalation risk if talc were present.
The brand's record and disclosure
RMS Beauty markets itself as a clean cosmetics brand but provides no public ingredient safety data, third-party testing results, or detailed sourcing transparency on talc or pigment origins. The brand has not issued statements on heavy metal limits, formaldehyde releasers, or talc asbestos testing. No recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product or brand. The silence on talc sourcing is notable given ongoing regulatory attention to talc purity.
How it compares in its category
Talc-based cream foundations remain common despite industry shift toward talc-free alternatives; this product sits in a middle-ground segment where talc is still acceptable but not marketed as a premium feature. Competing brands (both clean and conventional) increasingly offer talc-free cream bases, making talc a differentiator by absence rather than benefit. RMS Beauty's pricing and marketing do not offset the lack of transparency around talc sourcing or heavy metal assurance testing.
If you buy it
Use as directed for face application only; do not apply to broken skin or areas of concern without patch testing first. Store in a cool, dry place away from humidity to prevent clumping and bacterial growth in the cream base. Replace after 12 months or if you notice discoloration, separation, or odor changes. Avoid inhaling powder during application if you have respiratory sensitivity; cream formulas minimize this risk but conscious application is prudent.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc asbestos contamination
Cosmetic talc is FDA-regulated for asbestos in the US and EU, but RMS Beauty provides no public testing or sourcing documentation. Modern cosmetic-grade talc is very unlikely to contain asbestos, but lack of third-party verification leaves a small window of uncertainty.
Heavy metals in synthetic pigments (iron oxides, colorants)
Iron oxides used in cosmetics are typically safe and well-regulated. No recalls or testing failures are on record for RMS Beauty products. However, the brand does not publicly commit to heavy metal testing (lead, cadmium, mercury limits), leaving assurance dependent on manufacturer compliance without independent verification.
Formaldehyde releasers in preservatives
Cream foundations require preservatives; RMS Beauty does not disclose preservative system on this product's available labeling. If formaldehyde releasers (imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin) are used, they pose low risk in rinse-off or leave-on face products at typical concentrations, but no public data confirms the preservative choice.
Mica inhalation risk
Mica is inert but can be respirable if aerosolized as powder. This product is a cream formula, so inhalation risk is minimal. If the product is ever powderized or applied with a brush near the face, fine particle inhalation is theoretically possible but unlikely to cause acute harm at typical cosmetic use rates.
Fragrance allergens (if undisclosed)
RMS Beauty does not list added fragrance on standard labeling for this product. Natural or synthetic fragrance compounds are not evident in the stated ingredient list, suggesting low allergen risk from perfuming agents. Patch testing remains advisable for sensitive skin.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More foundation grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.