Revlon · Lipstick & Lip Products
ColorStay Ultimate Suede Lipstick Revlon
Cosmetic waterproofing raises concern; Revlon silent on PFAS composition.
ColorStay lipsticks include waterproof formulations that may use PFAS-based repellents. Revlon discloses no PFAS information; full ingredient transparency unavailable to consumers.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
wax, oils, colorants, waterproofing agents
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
ColorStay Ultimate Suede is a wax-oil emulsion lipstick with synthetic colorants, film-forming resins, and waterproofing agents that enable its long-wear claim. The 'suede' finish typically requires silica or talc-like matting agents plus polymers to create adhesion and reduce transfer. Waterproofing in lip products often relies on water-repellent chemistry that may include fluorinated compounds (PFAS-class materials), though Revlon does not publicly disclose which agents are used in this specific formulation.
The brand's record and disclosure
Revlon does not provide ingredient-level disclosure beyond the FDA-required ingredient list on packaging, and does not publish safety data sheets or PFAS content statements for consumers. The company has faced no major recalls or documented contamination incidents for this product line, but maintains minimal transparency compared to brands that voluntarily test for heavy metals or declare PFAS-free status. Revlon is not known for pursuing third-party safety certifications such as Clean Beauty or heavy metal testing programs.
How it compares in its category
Long-wear lipsticks across all brands typically use waterproofing agents; ColorStay is mid-range in terms of ingredient disclosure. Luxury brands like Estee Lauder and mass-market competitors (L'Oreal, Maybelline) use similar wax-polymer bases. Brands marketed as 'clean' or 'non-toxic' (e.g., Bite, RMS Beauty) often avoid synthetic waterproofing agents, rely on natural waxes, and publish heavier metal testing. ColorStay's price point does not align with premium safety testing standards.
If you buy it
Apply sparingly to avoid ingestion of colorants or film-forming polymers; lipstick is meant for external lips only and minimal swallowing is normal but not intended. Store away from heat (above 25C/77F) to prevent migration of wax and oils. Replace every 12-18 months to avoid bacterial colonization in the product. If you have sensitive skin or known allergies to synthetic dyes or fragrance, patch-test on inner arm first; discontinue if irritation occurs.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Heavy metals in synthetic colorants and pigments
Revlon does not publish heavy metal testing data for ColorStay lipsticks. Synthetic iron oxides, mica, and synthetic dyes used in suede finishes may contain trace lead or cadmium; no recalls on record for this product, but no public assurance of screening either.
Talc or talc-like inhalation risk (if present in matting agent)
The ingredient list does not explicitly declare talc for this formulation, but silica or other matting agents are likely present; risk is low during application since lipstick is applied to lips, not inhaled, but accidental inhalation of powder-form product is theoretically possible during sharpening or opening.
Fragrance allergen sensitization
ColorStay lipsticks typically include fragrance compounds listed as 'fragrance' or 'parfum' without specific ingredient breakdown; common allergens like limonene or linalool may be present and cause contact dermatitis or oral irritation in sensitive individuals.
Waterproofing agents (potential PFAS chemistry)
Long-wear waterproofing in lip products often relies on fluorinated polymers or siloxanes that may include PFAS-class compounds; Revlon's silence on this ingredient class and PFAS content is the primary concern and prevents definitive assessment.
Polymer film-forming resin safety (acrylic or polyquaternium types)
Film-forming polymers in long-wear lipsticks are widely used across the industry and carry no established toxicity risk at topical application levels; however, Revlon does not disclose which specific resins are used, limiting independent verification of safety.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Lipstick & Lip Products
Revlon
Super Lustrous Lipstick
wax, oils, pigments, emollients
Lower PFAS risk likely, but no brand transparency or testing.
⚠Risky category by default
Revlon
Super Lustrous Ultra Lipstick
wax, oils, pigments, emollients
Typical lipstick with no known PFAS risk markers.
⚠Risky category by default
Covergirl
Continuous Color Lipstick
Wax, oils, pigments, standard cosmetic bases
Lower concern lipstick, but no PFAS transparency from brand.
⚠Risky category by default
More lipstick & lip products grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.