Redken · Conditioner
Redken Volume Injection Conditioner
Lower concern, standard rinse-off cosmetic with no known PFAS triggers, but brand discloses nothing.
Redken Volume Injection Conditioner is a rinse-off hair conditioner with no disclosed PFAS-containing ingredients or water-repellent coating/stain-resistant treatments. Like most mainstream conditioners, it relies on standard conditioning polymers and emollients rather than fluorinated compounds.
Shop Redken on Amazon →Material
water-based conditioning polymers, emollients, surfactants
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Redken Volume Injection Conditioner is formulated primarily with water, conditioning polymers (likely acrylates or silicones), emollients, and standard cosmetic surfactants. These ingredients are designed to coat and smooth the hair shaft rather than penetrate skin, which significantly reduces systemic absorption risk compared to leave-on products. The water-based matrix means volatile organic compounds are minimal, and the rinse-off application pattern (seconds to minutes on wet hair) limits skin and scalp contact time.
The brand's record and disclosure
Redken (L'Oreal subsidiary) does not publicly disclose formulation details, allergen-testing protocols, or independent safety certifications for this product line. The brand does not advertise paraben-free, sulfate-free, or fragrance-transparency commitments as standard practice. No recalls or regulatory warnings have been issued for this specific product in publicly available sources. Redken relies on compliance with FDA and EU cosmetic regulations rather than proactive ingredient transparency.
How it compares in its category
Volume conditioners in this price range typically use identical polymer and silicone-based conditioning systems; Redken's formulation is conventional for mass-market hair care. Brands like SheaMoisture and Cantu offer similar conditioning performance with slightly higher transparency on botanical ingredients, though efficacy data does not show material safety differences. Prestige and salon-only alternatives (Olaplex, Briogeo) market cleaner ingredient lists but at 2-3x cost without established superiority in toxicological safety.
If you buy it
Apply only to damp hair lengths and ends, rinse thoroughly within 2-3 minutes, and avoid contact with eyes and broken skin. Do not apply heat (blow dryers, straighteners) immediately after; allow hair to air-dry for 10 minutes first to prevent localized heating of residual product. Discontinue use if scalp irritation or contact dermatitis develops; fragrance sensitivity is the most common adverse reaction in this category. No special storage precautions needed beyond standard room temperature away from direct sunlight.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens and irritants
Redken formulations typically contain fragrance blends (not specified as essential oils or synthetic); fragrance is a known contact allergen affecting 1-3% of the general population, particularly those with sensitive scalps or atopic dermatitis. Rinse-off format limits exposure compared to leave-on products.
1,4-dioxane contamination
No documented or reported cases of 1,4-dioxane in Redken Volume Injection Conditioner. However, this impurity can form during manufacture of polyethylene glycol-based emulsifiers if not tightly controlled; Redken does not publish manufacturing controls or third-party testing for this contaminant.
Heavy metals in colorants and preservatives
Standard cosmetic-grade preservatives and FDA-approved colorants carry minimal heavy metal risk at cosmetic use levels. No recalls or independent testing have identified lead, cadmium, or arsenic in Redken conditioners, though the brand does not disclose third-party heavy metal testing.
Silicone buildup and scalp irritation
Silicone-based conditioners can accumulate on hair and scalp over weeks of use, potentially trapping moisture and bacteria; this is a use-pattern risk rather than inherent toxicity. Risk is mitigated by periodic clarifying shampoo use (every 2-4 weeks) and is not established as a systemic health hazard.
Formaldehyde releasers in preservatives
Redken does not appear to use imidazolidinyl urea, dmdm hydantoin, or other formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in this product line based on available ingredient lists, though the brand does not formally certify formaldehyde-releaser-free status.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More conditioner grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.