Redken · Shampoo
Redken Frizz Dismiss Shampoo
Lower concern for PFAS risk; typical rinse-off cosmetic with no known water-repellent coating or water-repellent treatment.
Redken Frizz Dismiss is a rinse-off shampoo with no inherent reason to contain PFAS (no waterproofing, nonstick, or stain-resistance function). The brand makes no public PFAS disclosure.
Shop Redken on Amazon →Material
Water-based shampoo with silicones and conditioning agents
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Redken Frizz Dismiss Shampoo is a water-based formulation containing silicones (likely dimethicone or similar) and conditioning agents designed to coat and seal the hair cuticle. Silicones in rinse-off products are not absorbed into skin or systemically, and are rinsed away with water, making exposure minimal. The formula also includes surfactants and preservatives typical of mainstream shampoos; these are regulated ingredients at approved concentrations.
The brand's record and disclosure
Redken is owned by L'Oreal and operates under cosmetic industry standards but does not publish detailed ingredient sourcing or third-party safety certifications on this product. The brand has no documented recalls or major safety controversies tied to this shampoo line. Ingredient transparency is limited to the standard label; L'Oreal-owned brands generally comply with FDA and EU cosmetic regulations but do not voluntarily exceed them.
How it compares in its category
Frizz Dismiss Shampoo is a mainstream conditioning shampoo with a silicone-heavy profile, typical of mass-market anti-frizz products. It does not carry eco or clean-beauty certifications and sits in the conventional segment rather than natural or hypoallergenic tiers. For users with silicone sensitivity or preference for silicone-free formulas, alternatives exist; for general use, safety profile is consistent with comparable drugstore brands.
If you buy it
Use as directed: wet hair, apply, lather, rinse thoroughly with water. No special precautions are needed; the product is designed for rinse-off and poses no heat or storage hazards. If scalp irritation or hair buildup occurs after weeks of use, consider switching to a clarifying shampoo occasionally or testing a silicone-free alternative. Store in a cool, dry place and replace when empty or if separation occurs.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)
Water-based shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylation in surfactants. Redken does not publicly disclose 1,4-dioxane testing or removal on this product; the concentration, if present, is typically below 10 ppm and is not a documented recall trigger for mainstream shampoos.
Preservative sensitization (methylchloroisothiazolinone and related)
Mainstream shampoos including Redken products commonly use preservatives such as methylisothiazolinone. Rare allergic contact dermatitis has been documented in sensitive individuals; incidence is low but not zero. Patch testing or ingredient checking is advisable if scalp reactions develop.
Silicone accumulation on hair
High silicone content in rinse-off shampoos can deposit on hair over repeated use, especially in fine or thin hair, leading to buildup and weight. This is a cosmetic concern rather than a health hazard, but may necessitate periodic clarification or switching products for long-term users.
Fragrance allergen undisclosure
The product contains fragrance listed as a single ingredient without breakdown of components. Fragrance blends can include known allergens such as limonene, linalool, or cinnamyl alcohol; individuals with fragrance sensitivity should perform a patch test or request full fragrance composition from the manufacturer.
Heavy metals in colorants or pigments
No documented concerns or recalls involving heavy metals in this shampoo formulation. Cosmetic colorants in shampoos are regulated, and Redken is subject to FDA oversight; no specific testing has flagged contamination in this product line.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Shampoo
Credo Beauty
Roz Salt Scalp Scrub
salt crystals, mineral-based scrub
Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Public Goods Shampoo Refill
aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo
Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash
water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution
Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.
⚠Risky category by default
More shampoo grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.