Redken · Conditioner
Conditioner Frizz Dismiss Redken
Lower PFAS concern for a rinse-off conditioner; no known hazard signals, but Redken makes no public PFAS commitment.
Redken Frizz Dismiss Conditioner is a standard rinse-off hair product with no disclosed PFAS-prone ingredients (no waterproofing, grease resistance, or coating technology typical of high-risk products). The brand does not publicly address PFAS, nor does it hold third-party verification.
Shop Redken on Amazon →Material
Aqueous conditioning emulsion (water, oils, silicones, polymers)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Redken Frizz Dismiss is an aqueous emulsion combining water, conditioning oils (typically silicones and plant-derived oils), polymers for texture, and standard cosmetic preservatives. The silicone base (likely dimethicone or cyclomethicone) is common in rinse-off conditioners and does not bioaccumulate or cross skin barriers meaningfully in leave-on rinse contexts. Polymers add slip and frizz control but are inert once rinsed away; they do not absorb into skin or scalp. This formulation class carries minimal hazard because it is designed to be washed out within minutes.
The brand's record and disclosure
Redken is owned by L'Oreal and operates under parent-company cosmetic safety frameworks, which include compliance with EU and US cosmetic ingredient bans and restricted lists. Redken does not publish a specific PFAS avoidance policy or third-party certification (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny). The brand maintains standard ingredient disclosure through product labels and Safety Data Sheets but does not proactively communicate PFAS testing or commitments. No recalls or significant safety controversies are on record for this product line.
How it compares in its category
Frizz Dismiss sits in the mainstream premium conditioner tier, formulated similarly to competing brands (e.g., SheaMoisture, Cantu, Pantene Gold Series). Silicone-based conditioners are standard practice and carry no known hazard advantage over silicone-free alternatives; the choice is aesthetic preference. Redken's formulation is neither stricter nor laxer than category peers in disclosed ingredient practices. Price-point positioning and performance are drivers; safety profile is typical.
If you buy it
Use as directed: apply to damp hair lengths, leave for 1-3 minutes, rinse thoroughly with water. Ensure complete rinsing to avoid product buildup on scalp. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight; keep container sealed between uses. Discontinue if scalp irritation or contact dermatitis occurs; this is rare but possible with any cosmetic. Replace every 12-18 months after opening to minimize bacterial or mold contamination risk.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens
Redken Frizz Dismiss contains added fragrance (listed generically on labels); common fragrance compounds can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization in susceptible individuals. Rinse-off status limits exposure time, reducing risk versus leave-on products.
Preservative sensitivity (formaldehyde releasers)
No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin) are publicly listed for this product. Standard preservatives used (e.g., methylchloroisothiazolinone, phenoxyethanol) are cosmetic-approved and present minimal risk in rinse-off formulations.
Heavy metals in colorants or opacifiers
Conditioners in this category typically use iron oxides or mica for color; Redken does not source from known high-risk suppliers for these ingredients. No heavy metal contamination alerts are on record for this product.
Silicone accumulation or scalp buildup
Repeated use of silicone-based conditioners can lead to gradual buildup on hair and scalp if rinsing is incomplete; this is cosmetic rather than toxicological but may cause dulling or flaking. Risk is minimized by thorough rinsing and periodic clarifying washes.
Contamination during storage or use
Water-based emulsions can support bacterial or mold growth if container is left open, wet, or stored in warm/humid bathrooms. Risk is user-controlled; proper storage and timely replacement mitigate this.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More conditioner grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.