Rearz · Incontinence Protection Products
Rearz - Overnight Booster Pads Sample Pack
Unknown waterproof backing; skip until brand discloses materials.
Rearz makes absorbent period products with waterproof backing, but discloses no information about the polymer coating or PFAS testing. No public certifications or lab data available.
The safe swap
Lille
Suprem Light Mini 220ml 12 Packs Per Carton
70/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its C.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Absorbent core, waterproof backing layer (unspecified polymer)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Rearz overnight boosters use an unspecified absorbent core (likely superabsorbent polymer or cellulose blend) paired with a waterproof backing layer of unknown polymer composition. The backing is critical because it sits against skin for extended periods; if it contains PFAS-based water repellents or unknown synthetic polymers, leaching risk increases with moisture and body heat. The brand has not published material safety data sheets or ingredient transparency for this product, making independent hazard assessment incomplete.
The brand's record and disclosure
Reartz maintains no published stance on PFAS use, chemical testing, or material certifications for period-care products. The company does not list third-party safety certifications (FSC, Oeko-Tex, or similar) on product packaging or website. No major product recalls or safety controversies are on record for this line, but the silence on material composition is itself a transparency red flag in a category where skin contact hazards are high.
How it compares in its category
Competitors like Seventh Generation, Thinx, and Knix publish detailed chemical disclosures and many carry independent certifications for non-toxic materials. Rearts overnight boosters occupy a mid-market price point without matching disclosure standards of safety-focused brands. This product sits in a gap where cost is competitive but material assurance is below industry best practice for intimate care.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, as moisture exposure may increase leaching from the waterproof backing. Replace pads every 4-6 hours or sooner if saturation occurs, to minimize prolonged skin contact with the polymer layer. Discontinue use immediately if skin irritation, rash, or odor develops. Contact the brand directly to request a material safety data sheet and PFAS testing results before making repeat purchases.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
PFAS in waterproof backing
Waterproof polymer layer composition is undisclosed. PFAS-based water repellents are common in period-care products; extended skin contact with unknown polymers during overnight use elevates exposure risk.
Skin sensitizers in absorbent core or adhesives
No published testing or incidents on record for this product. Superabsorbent polymers and adhesives in period pads may contain residual monomers or cross-linkers; absence of data does not confirm safety.
Degradation or shedding of polymer layers
No reported failures documented. Extended moisture exposure during overnight use may degrade polymer coatings over time; risk level unknown without material specifications.
Fragrance or scent additives
Product packaging does not list fragrance content. If present, fragrance compounds can trigger allergic contact dermatitis, particularly on sensitive genital skin during extended contact.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Incontinence Protection Products
Lille
Suprem Light Mini 220ml 12 Packs Per Carton
absorbent core, cellulose, standard sanitary materials
Lower concern. Standard pad materials rarely treated with PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Lille
Suprem Form Maxi 2920ml
cellulose-based absorbent core, plastic backing
Lower concern. Standard period pad without known PFAS risks.
⚠Risky category by default
Lille
Suprem Form Regular Plus 1570ml 4 Packs Per Carton
absorbent core (cellulose, SAP); outer layers typical nonwoven polypropylene
Period pads pose minimal PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
More incontinence protection products grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.