Rachael Ray · Non-Stick Baking Molds
Rachael Ray Yum-o Nonstick Oven Lovin' Bakeware Set, 5-Piece
Nonstick type unknown. High PFAS risk likely without transparency.
Rachael Ray makes no public disclosure about the nonstick coating's composition or PFAS content. Most nonstick bakeware uses Teflon-type coating or similar Teflon-family coating.
The safe swap
Calphalon
Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold
80/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
nonstick coating, type unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This is a nonstick bakeware set, but Rachael Ray has not publicly specified whether the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon-type) or ceramic/non-PFAS alternative. The material underneath is typically steel or aluminum. Without coating transparency, you cannot know if the product uses legacy PFAS-heavy formulations or newer replacements. Nonstick durability and safety both hinge on this distinction.
The brand's record and disclosure
Rachael Ray cookware brand (produced by Groupe SEB) has not issued public statements about PFAS phase-out, safer coating alternatives, or third-party testing. The brand markets convenience and accessibility rather than material safety. No major recalls specific to this bakeware line are on record, but the lack of proactive disclosure is a red flag for consumers seeking chemical transparency.
How it compares in its category
Budget nonstick bakeware in this price tier typically uses standard Teflon-type coating or proprietary nonstick blends without PFAS-free certification. Competitors like OXO and GreenPan explicitly market ceramic or PFAS-free options. Rachael Ray sits in the middle market without such messaging, making direct safety comparison difficult. Premium brands and ceramic specialists offer more transparent alternatives at similar or modestly higher cost.
If you buy it
Keep oven temperatures below 400F to minimize coating stress and potential fume release. Hand wash instead of dishwashing to preserve the coating and reduce wear. Replace the bakeware if the nonstick surface visibly scratches, peels, or flakes. Store carefully to avoid metal utensil contact. Monitor for any burnt-food smell during heating, which may indicate coating degradation.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal decomposition)
If this product uses traditional Teflon-type coating, heating above 500F can release fumes; home ovens rarely exceed 500F, but preheating and broiler use raise risk. Without coating identification, you cannot rule this out.
Aluminum leaching
If the base is bare aluminum under the nonstick layer, scratches or coating wear can expose aluminum to acidic or high-temperature foods. Nonstick bakeware typically has sealed bases, but degradation over years increases this risk.
Coating degradation over time
Budget nonstick bakeware coatings commonly degrade within 2-5 years of use, especially with dishwasher exposure. Once flaking occurs, both safety and function are compromised. This product is not marketed as lifetime-durable.
Heavy metals in coating or substrate
No recalls or testing reports document lead or cadmium in this specific product line. Standard nonstick coatings do not inherently contain these metals, but independent testing would be required to confirm absence.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Baking Molds
Calphalon
Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold
Food-grade silicone
Lower PFAS concern; silicone baking molds don't typically contain PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Calphalon
Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)
Silicone (food-grade)
Lower concern. Silicone baking molds rarely contain PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Calphalon
Cobblestone Pan Silicone Baking & Freezing Mold
food-grade silicone
Lower PFAS concern; silicone molds rarely contain PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
More non-stick baking molds grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.