15/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Rachael Ray Cucina 10-Piece Nonstick Bakeware Set

Rachael Ray · Non-Stick Baking Molds

Rachael Ray Cucina 10-Piece Nonstick Bakeware Set

F · High PFAS

Unspecified nonstick coating. Skip until full transparency available.

Verdict: SkipUnspecified nonstick coating presents PFAS uncertainty; no brand transparency on composition. Usable with strict temperature and care limits.

Rachael Ray does not disclose the nonstick coating chemistry on this bakeware set. Without material transparency or third-party testing, PFAS risk cannot be assessed.

The safe swap

Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold

Calphalon

Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold

80/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Rachael Ray Cucina bakeware uses a nonstick coating whose chemical composition is not publicly disclosed by the brand. The base appears to be steel or aluminum, but without transparency on whether the coating is Teflon-type coating-based, ceramic, or another formulation, the specific risks cannot be fully assessed. Nonstick coatings degrade under high heat and physical damage, potentially releasing particles or fumes into food or air.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rachael Ray (owned by Groupe SEB) does not publicly commit to PFAS-free cookware or provide detailed chemical composition for its nonstick lines. No major recalls specific to this bakeware set are on record, but the brand's silence on nonstick ingredient transparency is a notable gap compared to competitors offering ceramic or explicitly PFAS-free coatings. The lack of certification from third-party safety bodies adds to the uncertainty.

How it compares in its category

Budget nonstick bakeware sets typically prioritize cost over ingredient transparency; this product follows that pattern. Higher-priced alternatives (GreenPan, Our Place) or budget ceramic-coated options provide more explicit PFAS-free claims. Standard aluminum or steel uncoated bakeware avoids nonstick concerns entirely but requires greasing and has different performance characteristics.

If you buy it

Keep oven temperature below 400F to reduce coating degradation risk. Avoid metal utensils that scratch the coating; use silicone or wood. Hand-wash only; dishwashers accelerate wear. Inspect the surface regularly for peeling or flaking; discard if coating is visibly compromised. Replace every 3-5 years even if undamaged, as older nonstick coatings degrade invisibly.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if Teflon-type coating-based coating)

Composition not disclosed; if the coating is Teflon-type coating (Teflon), overheating above 500F can release fumes toxic to birds and potentially harmful to humans. Lack of brand transparency makes it impossible to confirm or rule out Teflon-type coating use in this specific product.

Likely

Coating degradation and particle shedding

Nonstick coatings wear with use and age. Scratches, dishwasher use, and metal utensils accelerate breakdown. Fragments of coating can enter food, though health impact of ingesting small amounts is not well-established for unspecified formulations.

Possible

Aluminum leaching (if aluminum substrate)

If the base is aluminum, acidic foods (tomatoes, citrus) and prolonged contact may cause minor aluminum migration, though modern coatings typically minimize this. No test data on this specific product is publicly available.

None known

Lead or cadmium in coating or glaze

No recalls or reports for this product line; modern US cookware is not typically found to contain lead/cadmium, but unspecified coating composition means risk cannot be confirmed as zero.

Possible

Off-gassing of volatile organic compounds during heating

New nonstick cookware may emit odors and VOCs when first heated. Ventilate well during initial use. This typically dissipates after a few cycles and is not specific to this brand but common to budget nonstick products.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Baking Molds

Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold

Calphalon

Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold

Food-grade silicone

B
D
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; silicone baking molds don't typically contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)

Calphalon

Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)

Silicone (food-grade)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Silicone baking molds rarely contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Cobblestone Pan Silicone Baking & Freezing Mold

Calphalon

Cobblestone Pan Silicone Baking & Freezing Mold

food-grade silicone

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern; silicone molds rarely contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

More non-stick baking molds grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.