Rachael Ray · Non-Stick Baking Molds
Rachael Ray 9-Inch Nonstick Bakeware Springform Pan
Skip until brand discloses nonstick coating chemistry.
Rachael Ray has not disclosed the type of nonstick coating used on this springform pan. Standard nonstick bakeware often contains Teflon-type coating or other Teflon-family coating; absence of a PFAS-free claim warrants caution.
The safe swap
Calphalon
Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold
80/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Nonstick coating, type unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This springform pan uses a nonstick coating of unspecified chemical composition over steel. Rachael Ray cookware lines typically employ conventional nonstick polymers (likely Teflon-type coating-based or proprietary alternatives), but the brand has not publicly disclosed which chemistry is used in this specific product. The springform design adds a release mechanism that can wear and develop small debris over time, potentially mixing with food if the coating is compromised.
The brand's record and disclosure
Rachael Ray (owned by Groupe SEB) has not issued a public stance on PFAS avoidance or nonstick coating chemistry transparency. The brand markets cookware as 'safe and durable' but provides no third-party certification, toxicology data, or coating composition details on product labels or websites. No major recalls specific to this pan model are on record, but the company's silence on nonstick composition contrasts with competitors who now voluntarily disclose Teflon-type coating-free or PFOA-free claims.
How it compares in its category
Standard nonstick springform pans dominate this category; Rachael Ray is mid-market positioning. Competitors like OXO and All-Clad offer either transparent Teflon-type coating-free claims or third-party food-safety certifications that Rachael Ray does not. Cast iron or ceramic springform alternatives avoid nonstick chemistry entirely but lack the non-stick convenience and require different care protocols.
If you buy it
Never exceed 500F during baking, as nonstick coatings degrade and may release fumes above this threshold. Inspect the coating regularly for scratches, peeling, or discoloration; replace the pan if damage is visible. Hand wash only to preserve the coating; avoid metal utensils and high-heat stovetop use. Replace after 3-5 years or sooner if the coating shows signs of wear, as degraded nonstick layers are a contamination risk.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Teflon-type coating fume risk (nonstick degradation)
If coating is damaged or pan is heated above 500F, Teflon-type coating-based nonstick polymers may release hazardous fumes. Rachael Ray has not disclosed whether this product uses Teflon-type coating, Teflon-family coating alternatives, or non-fluorine nonstick chemistry, making risk assessment difficult.
Coating degradation and flaking
Nonstick springform pans of this price tier commonly show coating wear after 2-4 years of normal use, especially in the release hinge mechanism. Flaked coating particles can transfer to food if not detected during cleaning.
Steel substrate leaching (if uncoated areas exposed)
Once nonstick coating is scratched or damaged, the underlying steel substrate becomes exposed to acidic foods and can leach trace iron or other metals. This is a minor hazard if the pan is retired promptly upon visible damage.
Hinge and release mechanism durability
Springform release mechanisms on budget-tier pans often corrode or become stiff after repeated washing and thermal cycling, potentially causing rust particles to contact food or the pan to leak during use.
Aluminum substrate (if used) potential leaching
Product specifications do not confirm aluminum core; if aluminum is used and the nonstick coating degrades, minimal leaching to food is expected under normal pH, but long-term studies on aluminum exposure from cookware remain inconclusive.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Baking Molds
Calphalon
Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold
Food-grade silicone
Lower PFAS concern; silicone baking molds don't typically contain PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Calphalon
Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)
Silicone (food-grade)
Lower concern. Silicone baking molds rarely contain PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Calphalon
Cobblestone Pan Silicone Baking & Freezing Mold
food-grade silicone
Lower PFAS concern; silicone molds rarely contain PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
More non-stick baking molds grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.