75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Prose Alcohol-Free Conditioner

Prose · Shampoo

Prose Alcohol-Free Conditioner

C · Moderate

Lower concern; liquid cosmetics lack typical PFAS vectors, but no public brand transparency.

Verdict: BuyAlcohol-free liquid conditioner with no established safety red flags; low hazard profile typical of rinse-off hair care.

Prose's alcohol-free conditioner is a rinse-off liquid cosmetic with no inherent coating, waterproofing, or nonstick treatment, the main PFAS risk pathways. Liquid hair care products rarely require PFAS. However, Prose does not publicly disclose PFAS-free status or submit to third-party verification, leaving ingredient transparency gaps.

Shop Prose on Amazon →

Material

aqueous conditioner (liquid hair care, no coating or treatment layer)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Prose Alcohol-Free Conditioner is an aqueous (water-based) rinse-off product, meaning it sits on hair briefly before washing away, limiting absorption and systemic exposure. As a liquid conditioner without heat-applied coatings or sustained skin contact, it avoids hazard vectors common to cookware, textiles, or leave-on cosmetics. The formulation is customized per user but typically relies on emollients, silicones, and conditioning agents rather than problematic preservatives or heavy-metal pigments.

The brand's record and disclosure

Prose markets personalized hair care and emphasizes clean formulations but does not publish full ingredient transparency or third-party safety certifications on its website. No major safety recalls or regulatory actions against Prose conditioners are on record. The brand is silent on PFAS, fragrance allergen disclosure, and heavy-metal testing in pigments (if colorants are used), which is common but unhelpful for consumers seeking full transparency.

How it compares in its category

Rinse-off conditioners are among the lowest-risk personal care products because contact time is short and ingestion is accidental. Prose's alcohol-free formulation is safer than alcohol-containing alternatives, which can dry hair and irritate scalp. The brand sits mid-market for transparency; luxury brands like Aveeno publish allergen statements more openly, while mass-market brands rarely do better than Prose.

If you buy it

Use as directed and rinse thoroughly to minimize residue buildup. If scalp irritation or allergic reaction occurs, discontinue and patch-test on a small area first. Store below 25°C to avoid separation or degradation. No heat risk (unlike leave-on serums); no special maintenance needed. Replace when empty or if product separates visibly.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens

Prose does not publicly disclose fragrance components or allergen warnings. Rinse-off contact limits risk, but sensitive scalps may react to undisclosed fragrance mixtures.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

No evidence Prose uses formaldehyde donors (e.g., DMDM hydantoin) in this product line, but the brand does not confirm preservation systems publicly.

None known

Heavy metals in colorants or pigments

If this product contains colorants, lead or cadmium contamination is theoretically possible; Prose does not publish metal testing data for conditioners.

Possible

1,4-dioxane from surfactant ethoxylation

Liquid conditioners often use ethoxylated emulsifiers (e.g., ceteth compounds) which may contain trace 1,4-dioxane; Prose does not commit to dioxane-free sourcing.

None known

Microbial contamination if stored improperly

Aqueous products are susceptible to mold or bacterial growth if exposed to moisture; proper closure and storage prevent this, not a Prose-specific failure risk.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

Puracy

Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.