75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Moisturizing Shampoo

Prose · Shampoo

Moisturizing Shampoo

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern for typical liquid shampoo formulation; no red flags but brand offers no disclosure.

Verdict: BuyWater-based shampoo with no established safety red flags; Prose lacks PFAS transparency but category risk is low. Standard precaution: verify ingredient list for personal sensitivities.

Prose's moisturizing shampoo is a rinse-off liquid cosmetic with no known PFAS risk drivers (no waterproofing, nonstick, or grease resistance needed). The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS avoidance or testing.

Shop Prose on Amazon →

Material

Water-based shampoo formulation (typical: surfactants, humectants, conditioning agents)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Prose Moisturizing Shampoo is a water-based liquid formulation relying on synthetic surfactants (likely sodium lauryl sulfate or gentler alternatives) to cleanse, plus humectants such as glycerin or panthenol to retain moisture. These are stable, volatile-free ingredients at room temperature and do not degrade into hazardous byproducts during normal storage or use. Conditioning agents are typically silicones, fatty alcohols, or plant-derived polymers that deposit on hair without systemic absorption. The liquid format eliminates risks from particulate inhalation or thermal decomposition that solid or aerosol formats carry.

The brand's record and disclosure

Prose markets itself as a customized haircare brand with emphasis on ingredient transparency in marketing materials, yet does not publish comprehensive third-party certifications (such as EWG verification or Leaping Bunny) on their standard product pages. The brand has not faced documented recalls or public safety controversies related to their shampoo formulations. Prose does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or commit to PFAS-free sourcing, which is typical for mainstream haircare brands but notable given their transparency positioning.

How it compares in its category

Prose's formula sits in the mid-market segment: more ingredient-conscious marketing than drugstore brands (Pantene, Head and Shoulders) but lacking independent certifications that distinguish premium or clean-label competitors (Acure, Burt's Bees). Most mainstream liquid shampoos share similar surfactant and conditioning agent chemistries, so hazard profiles are broadly comparable. Prose's formulation risk is neither elevated nor reduced relative to equivalent price-point alternatives; differentiation is largely marketing and customization, not composition safety.

If you buy it

Store the bottle upright in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent ingredient degradation and preserve container integrity over the 12-18 month typical shelf life. Discontinue use immediately if irritation, rash, or eye reaction occurs and rinse thoroughly; patch-test the product on inner wrist or behind ear first if you have known fragrance or surfactant sensitivities. Check the full ingredient list against any personal allergens (common culprits: fragrance compounds, certain plant extracts, preservatives like sodium benzoate) before purchase, as Prose customization may introduce ingredients not present in all variants. No special disposal or safety maintenance is required; empty bottles are recyclable plastic.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Prose shampoos contain fragrance blends listed as 'Fragrance' or 'Parfum' on ingredient labels. Fragrance is a known trigger for contact dermatitis and scalp irritation in sensitive individuals; the specific allergen compounds are not disclosed. Risk is not unique to Prose but depends on personal skin reactivity.

None known

1,4-dioxane (surfactant contaminant)

Liquid shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of ethoxylation in certain surfactant synthesis. No testing results or recalls specific to Prose have been published. Industry data suggest modern formulations achieve very low levels (<10 ppm), and dermal absorption from brief shampoo contact is negligible.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

Prose does not list DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea, or other formaldehyde-releasing agents on publicly available ingredient disclosures for their standard moisturizing shampoo. Phenoxyethanol and sodium benzoate are more likely preservatives, which do not release formaldehyde.

Possible

Scalp or eye irritation from surfactant strength

Even gentle surfactants can irritate sensitive scalp skin or eyes on contact. Prose's exact surfactant concentration and type are proprietary to customization, so irritation risk varies by formulation. Standard mitigation is to rinse thoroughly and avoid eye contact.

None known

Microplastic content (polyethylene beads or microfibers)

Modern shampoos generally avoid polyethylene microbeads following regulatory phase-outs (US 2015+, EU 2018+). Prose does not advertise exfoliating beads in their moisturizing line, and no evidence of microplastic content in published formulations is available.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

Puracy

Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.