75/ 100
C
OverallF59/100
Philips Daily Collection Jar HD3017-55

Philips · Rice Cookers

Philips Daily Collection Jar HD3017-55

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern; glass food storage has minimal risk, but lid materials unspecified.

Verdict: BuyGlass jar with minimal leaching risk; lid composition unclear but rice cooker use pattern low-risk. No brand safety controversies on record.

The Philips Daily Collection jar is primarily glass, a chemically inert material with low PFAS risk. The concern is the metal and plastic lid components, which Philips does not publicly disclose material composition for. Without transparency on lid materials, confidence is moderate rather than high.

Shop Philips on Amazon →

Material

Glass jar with metal/plastic lid

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Uncoated safe material

Bare, uncoated material (cast iron, stainless, carbon steel, or glass) with no surface treatment to contain PFAS.

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Philips Daily Collection HD3017-55 uses a borosilicate glass jar as its primary food-contact surface, which is chemically inert and does not leach minerals, metals, or organic compounds under normal cooking temperatures (below 100C steam/100C liquid). The metal and plastic components of the lid are not publicly detailed by Philips; standard rice cooker lids typically use stainless steel bands and polypropylene or silicone seals. Glass itself poses minimal chemical hazard; the risk concentrates on unspecified lid materials and their durability over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Philips does not publicly disclose material composition beyond basic product names for this line and does not market specific safety certifications for the Daily Collection jar itself. The company has faced PFAS scrutiny in other product categories (air purifiers, cookware) but maintains no known major recalls tied to the HD3017-55. No independent safety testing results or regulatory warnings are available for this specific model.

How it compares in its category

Rice cooker replacement jars vary widely; glass models are among the safer options compared to non-stick coated aluminum jars (which risk Teflon-type coating degradation) or bare aluminum (aluminum leaching under acidic conditions). Philips glass jars are standard in their price tier and perform similarly to competitor models from Zojirushi or Panasonic in terms of material chemistry. The lack of transparent material disclosure is common across the category but represents a minor information gap rather than a safety red flag.

If you buy it

Inspect the rubber/plastic gasket and metal rim annually for cracks, warping, or discoloration; replace if compromised to avoid steam leakage and mold growth inside the cooker. Do not subject the glass to rapid temperature shocks (avoid iced water immediately after cooking) as borosilicate can crack under thermal stress. Hand wash the jar and lid rather than dishwasher if possible to extend gasket life. If the lid's plastic components show cloudiness, brittleness, or odor after 2-3 years, replacement is advisable.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Lid gasket and plastic degradation

Silicone or rubber gaskets in rice cooker lids can degrade under repeated steam exposure, risking mold colonization and silicone particle shedding into food. Philips does not specify gasket material; replacement intervals are not documented.

Possible

Metal rim corrosion and leaching

If the lid's metal components are not stainless steel (composition not disclosed), they may oxidize over time in the humid rice cooker environment, potentially releasing trace metals. Rust residue on the rim is a visual warning sign.

Possible

Borosilicate glass thermal shock fracture

While borosilicate is heat-resistant, rapid temperature changes (e.g., pouring cool water into a hot jar) can cause micro-fractures that may eventually lead to breaks, creating sharp glass debris in food.

None known

Undisclosed plastic lid composition

Philips has not published material safety data sheets for the lid plastics. No recalls or complaints are on record, but the absence of disclosure means BPA, BPS, or other endocrine-active compounds cannot be ruled out without independent testing.

Possible

Mold and bacterial growth in sealed assembly

If the gasket seals tightly and is not removed and dried thoroughly after each use, trapped moisture can foster mold in the lid channel, which is difficult to clean and can contaminate subsequent batches.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Rice Cookers

(2 pack) Rice Robot Personal Rice Cooker, PFAS-free, Nonstick. 1 Quart Capacity (4 Cups), with Stainless Steel Steamer Tray, Measuring Cups, Recipe

Aigostar

(2 pack) Rice Robot Personal Rice Cooker, PFAS-free, Nonstick. 1 Quart Capacity (4 Cups), with Stainless Steel Steamer Tray, Measuring Cups, Recipe

Nonstick coating (unspecified type); stainless steel steamer tray

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Explicit PFAS-free claim is a strong signal, but lack of third-party verification or coating detail leaves moderate uncertainty.

Risky category by default

More rice cookers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.