Pacifica Pressed Powder · Pressed Powder
Pacifica Makeup | Pacifica Beauty Neutralizing Mineral Mattifier -Pressed Powder Foundation Cherry | Color: Cream/Pink | Size: Os | Pm-66866084's
Lower PFAS concern; mineral powder foundations rarely require water-repellent coating or non-stick treatments.
Pacifica's mineral mattifier is a pressed powder foundation with no known PFAS drivers, mineral powders don't need water-repellent or grease-resistant coatings. Pacifica makes no PFAS claims and publishes no testing data.
Shop Pacifica Pressed Powder on Amazon →Material
mineral powder (talc or mica-based pressed powder)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This is a pressed mineral powder foundation, typically composed of mica, iron oxides, or talc as the base pigment carrier. Mineral powders are inherently less permeable than liquid foundations, meaning fewer synthetic binders and preservatives penetrate skin. The pressing process (compacting powder with minimal liquid binder) avoids many solvent-based manufacturing hazards present in fluid cosmetics. Pacifica markets this as part of their mineral line, which historically avoids synthetic dyes and heavy reliance on chemical preservatives.
The brand's record and disclosure
Pacifica Beauty is registered with the FDA and markets products under clean beauty positioning (no parabens, sulfates, or synthetic dyes claimed). The brand has not faced major safety recalls or heavy-metal contamination lawsuits on record, though they do not independently publish third-party heavy-metal or talc testing. Their ingredient transparency is typical for indie clean beauty, high on marketing claims but limited on verified testing disclosure. No established controversy regarding formaldehyde releasers, 1,4-dioxane, or talc contamination in their powder lines.
How it compares in its category
Pressed mineral powders sit in the lower-complexity end of cosmetics chemistry. Compared to liquid foundations (which require preservative systems and emulsifiers), powder formulations inherently reduce exposure to 1,4-dioxane, formaldehyde releasers, and phthalates. Pacifica's mineral offering is comparable to brands like Bare Minerals or Physicians Formula in hazard profile. It avoids the talc debate by leaning mica (though product-specific composition is not publicly itemized on the listing provided).
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry location away from humidity to prevent clumping and microbial growth in the compact. Do not apply near eyes if you have known sensitivities to iron oxides or mica; patch test if new to mineral formulations. Replace every 12-18 months or if the powder develops visible mold, off-odors, or caking that won't blend. Use clean applicators (brushes or pads) to avoid bacterial transfer; wash brushes weekly with mild soap.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Talc contamination (asbestos/respirable fibers)
No recalls or contamination findings on record for Pacifica powder lines. Mineral powder foundations are less likely to contain talc than body powders, and mica-based alternatives are increasingly standard; however, product-specific material composition is not publicly disclosed in the listing.
Heavy metals in iron oxide pigments (lead, cadmium, chromium)
Pacifica has no established history of heavy-metal contamination in powder products. Iron oxides and synthetic inorganic pigments used in cosmetics are FDA color-approved, but independent third-party testing results for this specific SKU are not available.
Formaldehyde-releaser preservatives
Pressed powders require minimal preservative systems due to low water content. Pacifica's clean beauty claims exclude formaldehyde-releasing agents, and no evidence of their use in their powder lines has surfaced.
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Product name and Pacifica's general formulations often include fragrance (natural essential oils or fragrance blends). If sensitive to fragrance or have compromised skin barrier, patch test first; specific fragrance disclosure is not detailed in the listing.
Mica respirable dust inhalation (occupational/chronic exposure)
Loose mineral powders can generate inhalable particles during application. For single-use or occasional application, risk is minimal. Frequent professional makeup artists or those with respiratory conditions should use wet-application methods or wear masks when handling loose mineral powders; this product's pressed format reduces dust generation relative to loose powders.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More pressed powder grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.