75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Pacifica Cherry Velvet Matte Setting Translucent Powder

Pacifica Pressed Powder · Pressed Powder

Pacifica Cherry Velvet Matte Setting Translucent Powder

C · Moderate

Lower concern; mineral powder with no known PFAS triggers, but Pacifica hasn't publicly disclosed PFAS testing.

Verdict: BuyTalc-based pressed powder with no documented heavy metal or formaldehyde concerns; mineral pigments carry standard cosmetics risk profile; PFAS lower concern.

Pacifica's matte setting powder is a talc-based mineral cosmetic without waterproofing, moisture barriers, or nonstick coatings, the typical product features that introduce PFAS. The brand has made no public PFAS-free claim or pursued third-party verification, leaving a transparency gap.

Shop Pacifica Pressed Powder on Amazon →

Material

Talc and mineral pigments (typical pressed powder base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Pacifica Cherry Velvet is a talc-based pressed powder, the industry standard for setting powders. Talc itself is inert as a cosmetic ingredient when pure, but the primary concern is asbestos contamination during mining or processing, which the FDA monitors through talc suppliers. Mineral pigments (iron oxides, mica) used for color are chemically stable and non-volatile in powder form, meaning they do not release fumes or gases during normal use. The 'matte' finish typically comes from talc's natural light-scattering properties rather than synthetic additives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pacifica markets itself as a cruelty-free, plant-derived beauty brand but has not published independent third-party testing data for talc purity or heavy metal screening on its website. The brand does not prominently disclose PFAS testing results, though talc powders are not typical PFAS vehicles. Pacifica has faced no major FDA recalls or regulatory actions specific to this product line as of available records. The brand holds Leaping Bunny certification for animal testing but does not hold NSF or heavy metal certifications.

How it compares in its category

Talc-based setting powders dominate the mass-market category; Pacifica's formulation is typical for this tier. Alternatives include silica-based powders (Maybelline Fit Me, Bare Minerals) and arrowroot starch blends (Physicians Formula), which avoid talc entirely but may be less durable or blendable. High-end talc powders (MAC Fix+, Chanel) often cost 2-3x more without documented safety advantages. Pacifica sits in the mid-range for price and transparency.

If you buy it

Apply with a fluffy brush in light layers to avoid product waste and minimize inhalation risk during application. Store in a cool, dry place away from moisture to prevent clumping and mold growth in the compact. Replace every 12-18 months if used daily; talc does not degrade chemically but packaging may crack or allow bacterial entry over time. If you have a talc sensitivity or asbestos concern, switch to a certified talc-free alternative; this is a personal choice, not a safety mandate.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Talc asbestos contamination

Talc mining can occasionally yield asbestos fibers; Pacifica does not disclose supplier testing or third-party verification of asbestos-free status. FDA-regulated talc suppliers are required to be asbestos-free, but independent confirmation from Pacifica would strengthen safety confidence.

None known

Heavy metals in mineral pigments

Iron oxides and mica used in cosmetic-grade pressed powders are not known to contain lead, cadmium, or arsenic at levels of concern. No recalls or adverse reports exist for this product or brand's pigment suppliers.

Possible

Inhalation risk during application

Talc powders generate fine particles when opened or applied with brushes. Users with respiratory sensitivity (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) should apply carefully and consider a silica-based alternative to minimize dust inhalation.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth if wet

Pressed powder compacts can accumulate moisture if stored in high-humidity bathrooms. Bacteria or mold may colonize the product surface over months; discard if visible discoloration or odor develops.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers or preservatives

Pacifica does not list formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in publicly available ingredient disclosures. Standard preservatives in pressed powders (sorbic acid, phenoxyethanol) do not release formaldehyde.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More pressed powder grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.