15/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
OXO Good Grips Everyday Kitchen Set

Oxo Good Grips · Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets

OXO Good Grips Everyday Kitchen Set

F · High PFAS

Nonstick cookware with unspecified coating. Consider alternatives or contact brand.

Verdict: SkipUnspecified nonstick coating raises PFAS concern; otherwise typical cookware with standard precautions needed to minimize coating degradation risk.

OXO does not disclose the nonstick coating type or PFAS status on standard product lines. Without third-party testing or clear material disclosure, risk remains uncertain.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonstick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The OXO Good Grips Everyday Kitchen Set uses a nonstick coating of unspecified chemical composition. OXO has not publicly disclosed whether this coating contains Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or alternative chemistries like ceramic or silicone-based systems. The substrate appears to be hard anodized aluminum or similar, which can leach aluminum if the nonstick layer degrades. Without transparency on the coating type, users cannot assess PFAS exposure risk or heat stability margins.

The brand's record and disclosure

OXO has maintained silence on PFAS content and coating chemistry in their nonstick cookware lines, which is typical for the mass-market cookware sector but reflects low prioritization of chemical transparency. The brand holds no known third-party certifications (e.g., GreenGuard, NSF) for chemical safety in cookware. OXO cookware has not appeared in major product safety recalls related to coating failure or leaching, but absence of public incident reports does not confirm safety.

How it compares in its category

OXO's nonstick cookware sits in the mid-market segment where chemical transparency is rarely a selling point; competitors like T-fal and Calphalon follow the same disclosure pattern. Premium alternatives (Le Creuset enameled cast iron, stainless steel) eliminate nonstick coating risks but cost 2-3 times more. Budget options often carry higher risk of rapid coating degradation; OXO's hard anodized base and reported durability place it slightly above budget tier but still below ceramicware or stainless alternatives in chemical clarity.

If you buy it

Use on low to medium heat only; manufacturers' high-heat ratings for nonstick cookware often exceed safe operating windows for Teflon-type coating coatings (which can off-gas above 500F/260C). Avoid preheating empty pans, which accelerates thermal stress on the coating. Hand-wash rather than dishwash to reduce abrasion and coating breakdown. Replace the pan immediately if you observe peeling, flaking, or visible bare metal; ingestion of coating fragments is a documented concern.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Teflon-type coating fume risk (heat exposure)

If the unspecified nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating-based, overheating above 500F/260C can release volatile organic compounds. OXO does not specify coating composition, so users cannot confirm whether Teflon-type coating is present or set safe temperature thresholds.

Likely

Coating degradation and delamination

All nonstick cookware coatings degrade with time and use. Once the nonstick layer flakes or peels, aluminum substrate exposure increases risk of aluminum leaching into food, particularly in acidic dishes.

Possible

Aluminum leaching from substrate

The hard-anodized aluminum base is corrosion-resistant when intact, but if the nonstick coating fails, direct contact between food and bare aluminum can occur, especially with acidic or alkaline foods, increasing aluminum migration.

Reported

Lack of chemical disclosure

OXO's silence on coating chemistry is consistent with industry practice but prevents informed risk assessment. Consumer reports and third-party testing have not independently verified this product's coating composition or PFAS content.

Possible

Long-term coating stability and replacement timeline

User reviews suggest OXO nonstick cookware typically remains functional for 3-5 years of regular use before visible wear appears. No published durability standard exists for consumer nonstick cookware, making replacement decisions subjective and increasing likelihood of using degraded cookware.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets

Le Creuset Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon

Le Creuset

Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon

silicone (no nonstick coating)

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; silicone spatula carries minimal risk.

Risky category by default

Le Creuset Revolution Balloon Whisk

Le Creuset

Revolution Balloon Whisk

Stainless steel wire

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Bare stainless steel whisk, no coating or nonstick surface.

Risky category by default

OXO Good Grips 3-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

Oxo Good Grips

3-Piece Silicone Utensil Set

Silicone utensil heads, thermoplastic handle

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Silicone utensils carry minimal PFAS risk inherently.

Risky category by default

More non-stick kitchen gadgets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.