20/ 100
F
OverallF8/100
Outdoor Products Watertight Gear Expandable 40L White Dry Bag

Outdoor Products · Portable Outdoor Gear Bags

Outdoor Products Watertight Gear Expandable 40L White Dry Bag

F · High PFAS

Skip. Waterproof coating unspecified, no PFAS transparency.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof coating chemistry unspecified and PFAS risk unaddressed by brand; material itself (PVC/TPU) poses minor leaching risk if degraded. Use with caution and avoid prolonged skin contact.

Dry bags typically use water-repellent coating or PFC coatings for water resistance. Outdoor Products provides no material or PFAS disclosure, limiting informed choice.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

PVC or TPU dry bag with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This dry bag is constructed from either PVC (polyvinyl chloride) or TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane), materials chosen for water resistance. Both require waterproof coatings or lamination to function, and the brand has not disclosed which coating is used. PVC itself can leach plasticizers (phthalates) under heat or prolonged contact with skin oils; TPU is more chemically stable but still depends on its coating. The unspecified coating is the critical unknown: it may contain PFAS, which the brand has not addressed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Outdoor Products has published no transparency statements on waterproof coating chemistry, PFAS use, or material certifications for this product line. The brand does not appear in major sustainable gear databases or third-party testing registries. No recalled safety issues have been documented for this specific product, but the silence on coating disclosure is a red flag in an industry where PFAS-free alternatives exist.

How it compares in its category

Dry bags span a wide spectrum: budget models (like this one) typically use PVC or TPU with unspecified coatings, while premium brands (e.g., Patagonia, Klattermusen) disclose PFAS-free or recycled materials and submit to third-party testing. Mid-range alternatives from Sea to Summit or Ortlieb publish coating specs. This product sits in the lower-disclosure tier, where material safety is assumed rather than verified.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged skin contact with the interior if storing items like wet clothes or swimwear; line it with cotton if needed to minimize phthalate or coating exposure. Do not expose to direct sunlight for extended periods, as UV can degrade PVC and increase leaching. Inspect the seams and coating annually for cracks or peeling; a degraded bag should be replaced. Wash the exterior occasionally with cool water and mild soap, not hot water or solvents.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Phthalate leaching (PVC plasticizer migration)

If this bag is PVC, dibutyl phthalate (DBP) or similar plasticizers are likely present to keep the material flexible. Leaching increases with heat, skin oils, and prolonged contact. Risk is low for occasional use but rises if used to store wet clothing against bare skin for hours.

Possible

Waterproof coating degradation and off-gassing

PVC and TPU coatings (especially solvent-applied ones) can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during and shortly after manufacturing. The unspecified coating makes it impossible to assess if PFAS, isocyanates, or other respiratory irritants are present. New bags may smell; ventilate before use indoors.

Possible

Microplastic shedding from coating wear

As the waterproof coating flexes and degrades over years of use, small particles may detach. If the bag contacts food or drinking water directly, microplastic ingestion is a non-zero risk. Use an inner liner for food storage.

None known

Antimony or heavy metals in colorants (white coating/pigment)

The white pigmentation is likely titanium dioxide (TiO2), which is stable and low-risk. No public testing or recalls have identified heavy metal contaminants in Outdoor Products dry bags, but the brand's lack of testing disclosure means this remains unverified.

None known

Formaldehyde or azo dyes (if fabric interior or reinforcement)

Dry bags are usually all synthetic (PVC or TPU) with minimal fabric. If nylon or polyester reinforcement is present, formaldehyde-based resins are possible but unlikely to off-gas significantly into the bag interior. No established risk for this product.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Portable Outdoor Gear Bags

REI Co-op Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

REI Co-op

Trailgate Gear Bin Green 140 L

Polypropylene storage bin, no water-resistant coating mentioned

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Lower PFAS concern for bare plastic storage container.

Risky category by default

More portable outdoor gear bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.