50/ 100
F
OverallF46/100
OnCore Golf Balls

OnCore · Golf Equipment & Balls

OnCore Golf Balls

F · High PFAS

No public PFAS data; golf ball cover materials often use Teflon-family coating.

Verdict: SkipOnCore golf balls pose minimal established safety hazards beyond unconfirmed PFAS in cover; urethane/rubber composition is inert during normal play.

OnCore provides no public PFAS disclosure. Golf ball covers commonly contain durable coatings that may include fluorochemicals for water and scuff resistance. No independent testing found.

The safe swap

Wilson Staff Zip Golf Balls

Wilson

Wilson Staff Zip Golf Balls

85/100 safety

B

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Urethane/rubber core, dimpled synthetic cover

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Unknown / proprietary coating

Proprietary coating with no disclosed chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

OnCore balls use a urethane or synthetic rubber cover over a rubber/urethane core, a standard composition across most modern golf balls. These materials are chemically stable during normal use (room temperature, outdoor exposure, impact). Unlike cookware or food-contact plastics, golf balls do not leach into consumables and are not heated or microwaved. The dimple pattern is pressed into the cover and does not involve coatings that degrade or shed microplastics under typical play conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

OnCore (owned by Callaway Golf) does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or PFAS content statements for consumer golf balls. The brand has no major product recalls or safety controversies on record. Industry-wide, golf ball manufacturers rarely disclose Teflon-family coating use in covers, though it is common for water-repellent durability. OnCore offers no third-party certifications for material composition or toxicity screening.

How it compares in its category

OnCore balls are mid-range to premium performance products comparable to Titleist Pro V1, Callaway Chrome Soft, and Bridgestone Tour B in construction and material class. All major brands use similar urethane or synthetic elastomer covers; none disclose PFAS status. Golf balls as a category carry minimal consumer safety risk compared to daily-contact products like cookware or textiles. Durability and cover degradation (observable wear, scuffing) occur over hundreds of shots, not from chemical leaching.

If you buy it

Store balls at room temperature away from direct sunlight; UV exposure degrades synthetic covers over time but does not create a safety issue. Discard balls when cover becomes visibly scuffed, cracked, or loses water repellency (typically after 50-100 rounds depending on play intensity). Do not incinerate used balls; standard landfill or recycling programs are appropriate. Wash with mild soap and water if desired; no special handling is required.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Teflon-family coating cover (potential PFAS source)

Golf ball covers often use Teflon-family coating for water resistance and durability, but PFAS content is not disclosed by OnCore or competitors. No leaching occurs during normal play; hazard is occupational (manufacturing) or environmental (landfill/incineration), not consumer use.

None known

Microplastic shedding

Synthetic urethane/rubber covers are dense and durable; they do not shed microplastics under normal play impact. Cover degradation produces visible flaking, not fine particulates that would be inhaled or ingested.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or dyes

No public data or recalls exist for cadmium, lead, or other toxic metals in OnCore ball coatings. Cosmetic dyes in golf ball covers are not ingested and face no safety standard for this non-food product.

None known

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Urethane and rubber balls may emit trace VOCs when new, but exposure is negligible during outdoor play and dissipates quickly. No respiratory or neurological hazard is established for golf balls stored or used in normal conditions.

None known

Allergic reaction to material components

Urethane and rubber are low-allergen materials. No cases of contact dermatitis or latex-type reactions from OnCore balls appear in public records. Risk is comparable to synthetic sports equipment (synthetic rubber grips, polymer apparel).

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Equipment & Balls

Wilson Staff Zip Golf Balls

Wilson

Staff Zip Golf Balls

Synthetic rubber/elastomer cover, solid core

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern. Golf ball cores/covers rarely treated with PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Vice Golf 24-Ball Variety Pack

Vice Golf

24-Ball Variety Pack

Urethane and synthetic rubber cover over core materials

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf balls carry low PFAS risk; no public concerns documented.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Vice Golf Boost Starter Set

Vice Golf

Boost Starter Set

Surlyn cover, rubber/synthetic components

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Golf balls carry minimal PFAS risk; skip only if extreme caution desired.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf equipment & balls grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.