75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Old Spice Body Wash Moisturize with Shea Butter

Old Spice · Body Wash

Old Spice Body Wash Moisturize with Shea Butter

C · Moderate

Lower concern. Standard body wash with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict: BuyStandard aqueous body wash with no established hazards; glycerin and shea butter are well-tolerated emollients; lower PFAS concern aligns with category baseline.

Old Spice Body Wash Moisturize is a rinse-off liquid cosmetic with no documented PFAS use, Teflon-family coating coatings, or water-repellency claims. The brand makes no PFAS disclosure, but the product category and formulation (water, glycerin, shea butter) present no typical PFAS vectors. No published lab data available.

Shop Old Spice on Amazon →

Material

aqueous body wash with glycerin and shea butter

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Old Spice Moisturize is a water-based body wash formulated with glycerin (a humectant that draws moisture to skin) and shea butter (an occlusive emollient). These are among the most benign conditioning agents in personal care and do not bioaccumulate or pose acute toxicity risks at use levels. The base is surfactant-driven (likely sodium lauryl sulfate or milder variants) to remove oils and dirt; at dilution in shower water, exposure is brief and rinse-off reduces retention.

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter and Gamble (Old Spice's parent) has not published specific PFAS avoidance policies for body wash lines, though the company has faced scrutiny on "forever chemicals" in other product categories. Old Spice does not appear on major public PFAS restriction commitments (e.g., Safer Chemicals Healthy Families pledges). However, the standard aqueous body wash category carries lower inherent PFAS risk than water-resistant or grease-barrier products (e.g., sunscreens, non-stick coatings). No major recalls or safety controversies specific to this formulation are on record.

How it compares in its category

Rinse-off body washes like this occupy the lower-hazard end of personal care products because they have minimal skin dwell time and no occluded retention. Compared to leave-on products (lotions, deodorants), rinse-offs avoid bioaccumulation concerns. Old Spice Moisturize is comparable to unscented, dermatologist-tested alternatives; brands like Cetaphil or CeraVe may offer slightly more transparent allergen labeling, but chemical hazard profiles are functionally similar for glycerin-based aqueous systems.

If you buy it

Use as directed: lather, rinse thoroughly with water. Do not ingest. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent microbial growth in the bottle; if the formula shows discoloration or odor changes after long storage, discard. Patch-test on a small skin area if you have known fragrance sensitivities or eczema; Old Spice formulations include fragrance compounds that may trigger contact dermatitis in susceptible individuals, though prevalence is low. No special disposal precautions needed beyond standard household waste.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Old Spice body washes contain proprietary fragrance blends; fragrance is a known contact allergen in personal care, affecting roughly 1-3% of users. Individual sensitivity depends on skin condition and prior exposure history; no specific fragrance component is listed as prohibited by major regulatory bodies.

Possible

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in surfactants)

Surfactants used in body washes can contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Procter and Gamble has stated commitment to removing it, but Old Spice product-specific data is not publicly disclosed. Rinse-off use limits dermal absorption; regulatory limits in cosmetics are set to minimize risk.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

No formaldehyde releasers are identified in publicly available Old Spice Moisturize ingredient lists. Modern aqueous body washes typically use safe preservative systems (e.g., phenoxyethanol, methylchloroisothiazolinone); use pattern and rinse-off further reduce any theoretical risk.

None known

Heavy metals in colorants and pigments

This product is not marketed as a colored or pigmented formula; Old Spice Moisturize appears clear or translucent, reducing likelihood of metal-bearing dyes. Regulatory oversight of colorant limits in rinse-off cosmetics is established in most jurisdictions.

Possible

Microbial contamination from storage or reuse

Body wash bottles in moist bathroom environments can harbor bacterial or fungal growth if left open or if residue accumulates. This is a use-pattern risk, not a manufacturing defect; proper capping and occasional bottle cleaning mitigate it.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 82% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.