75/ 100
C
OverallF57/100
Olay Ultra Moisture Shea Butter Body Wash

Olay · Body Wash

Olay Ultra Moisture Shea Butter Body Wash

C · Moderate

Lower concern, body wash is not a PFAS-typical use case, but Olay makes no public disclosure.

Verdict: BuyBody wash with typical surfactant-emollient formula, no major hazards on record; Olay's silence on PFAS is normal for category.

Olay Ultra Moisture Shea Butter Body Wash contains no known PFAS-prone ingredients (nonstick coatings, water repellency, stain resistance). Body washes and rinse-off cosmetics are inherently lower-risk for PFAS exposure because they are not designed to stay on skin or form protective barriers.

Shop Olay on Amazon →

Material

aqueous surfactant blend, emollients, glycerin (typical body wash)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Olay Ultra Moisture Shea Butter Body Wash is an aqueous rinse-off product based on surfactants (detergents) blended with glycerin, shea butter, and emollients. Because body wash is diluted in water, applied briefly to skin, and rinsed away, systemic absorption and bioaccumulation risks are minimal compared to leave-on cosmetics. The formula is designed to clean while softening skin; shea butter and glycerin act as humectants to prevent drying.

The brand's record and disclosure

Olay (Procter & Gamble subsidiary) does not publicly disclose full ingredient sourcing or third-party safety testing for this product. The brand has no documented safety recalls or regulatory warnings for this body wash line. P&G maintains general cosmetic safety compliance and product liability insurance but does not publish detailed chemical safety data sheets for consumer body care products.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mainstream mass-market segment. Body washes with similar glycerin and botanical-oil formulations are common; Olay's positioning emphasizes moisturization rather than novelty. No independent testing results distinguish this formula from comparable drugstore alternatives in terms of contaminant or irritant risk.

If you buy it

Body wash requires no special storage beyond room temperature and standard humidity (avoid prolonged exposure to direct heat). Use as directed: apply to skin, lather, rinse thoroughly with water. Discontinue if skin irritation or rash develops. The product is designed for single-use wash cycles and does not require maintenance or replacement triggers beyond empty bottle.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

1,4-dioxane (surfactant contaminant)

Certain ethoxylated surfactants common in body washes may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct. Olay does not publicly disclose contaminant testing; FDA allows up to 10 ppm in rinse-off products due to minimal dermal absorption.

Possible

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Product lists 'fragrance' as a single ingredient without naming components. Synthetic fragrance blends can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals; Olay does not publish fragrance composition details.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

No formaldehyde releasers (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are reported in Olay body wash formulations, though ingredient lists are proprietary and incomplete on consumer labels.

None known

Heavy metals in colorants (if present)

Body washes typically contain minimal pigmentation; Olay Ultra Moisture Shea Butter appears lightly colored but no lead, cadmium, or chromium contamination is documented for this product line.

Reported

Skin irritation from surfactant stripping (use-related)

Some users report mild dryness or sensitivity with body washes despite glycerin content, particularly with frequent use or on compromised skin. Shea butter content may mitigate but does not eliminate detergent irritation potential.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.