Odyssey · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
PEdALED Odyssey Waterproof Gloves
Skip until brand clarifies waterproof treatment chemistry.
Waterproof gloves lack disclosed material or coating details, creating uncertainty about PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments. No certifications or public testing reduce visibility into chemical safety.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
unspecified waterproof coating on glove shell
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
PEdALED Odyssey Waterproof Gloves use an unspecified waterproof coating applied to the glove shell, likely synthetic polymer or treated fabric. The actual chemistry is not publicly disclosed by the brand. This matters because waterproof treatments in apparel often rely on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) or other durable water repellents (DWRs); without material transparency, you cannot assess whether the gloves introduce persistent chemicals into skin contact or household wash water.
The brand's record and disclosure
Odyssey (the parent brand for PEdALED cycling products) does not publicly disclose waterproof treatment chemistry or commit to PFAS-free standards. No major safety recalls or formal certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign) are on record for this specific glove model. The brand's silence on fluorochemical use is a significant gap in consumer safety information and suggests either lack of sourcing transparency or reliance on conventional (possibly PFAS-containing) water-repellent coating coatings.
How it compares in its category
Most mainstream cycling gloves use one of three waterproofing approaches: Teflon-type coating membranes (Goretex-style, PFAS-intensive), polyurethane/neoprene linings (lower PFAS risk but less breathable), or wax/silicone treatments (minimal chemical hazard but less durable water resistance). Without disclosure, the Odyssey gloves cannot be positioned reliably against premium brands that certify PFAS-free water-repellent coating or budget alternatives using simpler coatings. This opacity places them in a middle tier of risk.
If you buy it
Wash gloves separately in cold water with mild detergent to minimize coating degradation and reduce microfiber/chemical shedding. Air dry completely; do not machine dry or expose to prolonged heat, which can compromise waterproof integrity and increase leaching. Inspect the coating quarterly for cracks, peeling, or loss of water beading; once degradation is visible, water will penetrate and the gloves should be replaced. Request material documentation from the retailer before purchase if possible.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fluorochemical residues (PFAS-adjacent water-repellent coating coatings)
Unspecified waterproof treatment may contain legacy PFAS-based durable water repellents or newer fluorinated alternatives. Skin contact and wash water leaching are plausible routes; brand silence prevents verification of safer chemistries.
Coating degradation and microfiber shedding
Waterproof coatings degrade with use and washing, releasing microfibers and coating particles. Cycling gloves experience high friction and flex stress, accelerating breakdown and increasing inhalation or ingestion risk of coating fragments.
Formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing resins
Waterproof and water-resistant textile treatments sometimes employ formaldehyde-based crosslinkers for durability. No test data or material safety data sheets are publicly available for this product, making assessment impossible.
Azo dyes or heavy metal pigments in glove colorants
No specific recalls or testing results for PEdALED Odyssey gloves document heavy metal or restricted dye contamination. Standard polyester and nylon textiles in cycling apparel rarely trigger azo dye concerns, but certification (OEKO-TEX) is absent here.
Antimony in polyester shell material
Polyester fabric may contain antimony catalyst residues from manufacturing. While typically minimal in apparel, gloves with direct skin contact warrant confirmation; brand does not certify antimony-free or low-antimony sourcing.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.