20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Galway Bay Apparel, LLC Men's Golf Rain Gloves

Odyssey · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves

Galway Bay Apparel, LLC Men's Golf Rain Gloves

F · High PFAS

Skip until coating details disclosed; water-repellent coating treatments often contain PFAS

Verdict: SkipWater-resistant coating composition undisclosed; PFAS risk unconfirmed but common in water-repellent coating gloves. Other hazard data absent. Buy only if coating details obtained or acceptable uncertainty.

Golf rain gloves with unspecified waterproof coating. Brand provides no PFAS disclosure or safety information, typical PFAS risk for water-repellent textiles.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant coating, unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Odyssey lists this as synthetic fabric with water-resistant coating but does not specify the coating chemistry, polymer type, or finish brand. water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings on athletic gloves historically use fluorochemicals (PFAS family) to achieve water beading and durability through repeated use and washing. Without disclosure of polyurethane vs. silicone vs. fluorocarbon basis, you cannot assess whether this glove carries persistent bioaccumulative compounds in the coating.

The brand's record and disclosure

Odyssey is owned by Callaway Golf and does not publicly disclose water-resistance treatment chemistry on product pages or technical sheets for apparel. The brand has not signed AFIRM (Apparel Industry Commitment to Reduce Chemicals) or similar transparency pledges. No third-party certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX) are listed, limiting independent verification of finish safety.

How it compares in its category

Golf rain gloves span a wide spectrum: budget models often use cheaper Teflon-type coating or fluorocarbon water-repellent coating, premium brands increasingly switch to Teflon-type coating-free or wax-based alternatives (e.g., organic cotton blends with paraffin). Odyssey positions here as mid-tier athletic performance, where cost and durability often override toxicology disclosure. Competitors at similar price points rarely disclose coating type either.

If you buy it

Wash by hand in cool water; avoid machine heat and dryers, which can degrade or off-gas coating. Do not bleach or use fabric softeners, which interact unpredictably with undisclosed finishes. Replace when water no longer beads (typically 1-2 seasons) rather than re-treating, as home water-repellent coating sprays introduce additional unknown chemistry. Request material safety data sheet from retailer or manufacturer if concerns persist.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-resistant coating

water-repellent coating finishes on synthetic golf gloves commonly use PFAS (C6 or C8 fluorochemicals) to meet durability standards; Odyssey does not disclose treatment type, making presence unconfirmed but typical for this category and price point.

None known

Formaldehyde in synthetic fiber or finish resin

No published recalls or warnings specific to Odyssey golf apparel for formaldehyde. Synthetic polyester/nylon blends may contain trace formaldehyde resins from dyeing or anti-wrinkle finishing; risk is low for athletic gloves but unverified by third-party test.

None known

Azo dyes in synthetic fabric

Golf glove colorways (black, white, navy) do not trigger azo-dye regulation red flags in EU or California. No brand-specific reports. Risk is minimal unless glove is heavily hand-dyed in-house, which Odyssey does not do.

Possible

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Undisclosed water-resistant coatings can flake or shed into skin or washing water as they wear. Microplastic particle risk is material-dependent (Teflon-type coating vs. polyurethane behave differently); cannot assess without coating identification.

None known

Allergic contact reaction to finish or dye

No published complaints of dermatitis or allergic reaction to Odyssey golf gloves. Risk is low for most users but individualized; those with synthetic-sensitive skin should test on small area first.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Risky category by default

Bridgestone Soft Grip Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Soft Grip Golf Glove

Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles

D
D · Elevated

Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.

Risky category by default

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

D
D · Elevated

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Risky category by default

More golf balls & golf gloves grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.