Nike · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Nike Men's Tech Extreme VII Golf Glove
Golf glove with likely water-repellent coating, PFAS risk unconfirmed by brand.
Nike does not disclose PFAS use in this golf glove. Leather and synthetic materials likely treated with water-resistant finish, standard in golf gloves, but specific chemistry unstated. No third-party verification available.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather palm with synthetic backing, water-repellent coating treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Tech Extreme VII combines leather on the palm (a natural material) with synthetic backing, likely polyester or nylon. Nike applies a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish to improve moisture resistance during play. water-repellent coating coatings on athletic textiles commonly contain PFAS compounds, though Nike has not publicly disclosed the specific chemistry of this treatment. Leather itself is generally low-risk, but the synthetic backing and surface treatments introduce potential chemical exposure.
The brand's record and disclosure
Nike has not publicly committed to PFAS elimination in athletic apparel and remains silent on the chemistry of water-repellent treatments in gloves. The company has faced scrutiny over broader chemical transparency in footwear and apparel but has not issued specific recalls for PFAS in golf gloves. Nike's sustainability disclosures do not typically detail synthetic coating compositions in accessories. Independent verification of non-PFAS water-repellent coating use in this product is not available.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are a niche category; most premium models (Titleist, Callaway, FootJoy) use similar leather-plus-synthetic construction with water-repellent coatings of undisclosed origin. Uncoated leather-only gloves exist but sacrifice moisture control. Nike's Tech Extreme line sits mid-to-premium pricing without transparency advantages over competitors. No major golf glove manufacturer has publicly eliminated PFAS from water-repellent coating treatments.
If you buy it
Rinse the glove occasionally in cool water to remove sweat and salt buildup, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and the leather. Avoid machine washing, hot water, or prolonged soaking, as these damage both the synthetic backing and the treated surface. Store in a dry location to prevent mildew and material breakdown. Replace when the palm leather shows signs of wear or the grip deteriorates; glove lifespan is typically 1-2 years with regular play.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Formaldehyde resins
Leather tanning and synthetic fabric finishing can involve formaldehyde-based resins. No recalls or test reports of excessive formaldehyde in Nike golf gloves are on record; leather goods typically release low levels if treated properly.
Azo dyes
Both leather and synthetic backing may be dyed; if synthetic components use conventional azo dyes, carcinogenic amines could be present. Nike does not publicly specify dye standards for this glove. Direct skin contact occurs, but dermal absorption during athletic use is minimal.
Synthetic backing degradation and microfiber shedding
Polyester or nylon backing can shed microfibers during washing or friction from repeated use and grip. No specific data on shedding rates for this model; shedding is typical of synthetic athletic wear but quantities remain unquantified.
Antimony in polyester
Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in polyester production. Finished gloves rarely leach measurable antimony, and no contamination has been reported in Nike golf gloves. Dermal contact risk is low unless the product is chewed or ingested.
Contact allergies from dyes, tanning agents, or finishes
Some users may react to leather tanning agents (chromium salts, vegetable tannins) or dyes on synthetic backing, particularly with prolonged moist contact on hands. Pre-use washing may reduce residual finish chemicals.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 55% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Soft Grip Golf Glove
Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles
Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Risky category by default
More golf balls & golf gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.