PFAS score
New Balance · Winter Gloves
Balance Hybrid Sport Cold Running & Walk Glove Black Touchscreen Men
water-repellent coating-treated gloves carry PFAS risk; New Balance silent on composition.
Running gloves typically use water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatments that often contain PFAS. New Balance provides no PFAS disclosure for this product, making risk assessment difficult.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
synthetic textile blend with water-repellent coating treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Winter Gloves
Patagonia
Synchilla Gloves
Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed
Lower PFAS concern for core fleece; verify any water-repellent finish separately with Patagonia.
⚠Risky category by default
Icebreaker
Quantum Gloves
Merino wool blend, likely uncoated or standard knit
Lower-concern baseline for wool gloves; no known PFAS triggers, but Icebreaker has not publicly disclosed water-repellent coating treatment details.
⚠Risky category by default
Icebreaker
260 Tech Glove Liner
Merino wool blend, likely polyester base
Lower PFAS concern; natural fiber liner without known water-resistant treatment, but brand transparency is absent.
⚠Risky category by default
More winter gloves grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.