20/ 100
F
OverallF4/100
Nautica Submariner Duffel

Nautical · Waterproof Bags & Luggage

Nautica Submariner Duffel

F · High PFAS

Duffel likely has water-repellent coating; brand silent on PFAS risk.

Verdict: SkipPolyester duffel with water-repellent coating carries possible PFAS and formaldehyde-resin risks; brand silent on both. Acceptable with informed use.

Nautica makes casual duffle bags with water-repellent finishes typical of polyester travel gear. No public PFAS disclosures or certifications available; water-repellent coating treatments often contain PFAS-class chemicals.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester duffel with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Nautica Submariner is polyester, a synthetic petroleum-derived fiber commonly treated with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish to shed water without soaking through. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFOA/PFOS fluorinated compounds, though some manufacturers have shifted to shorter-chain or non-fluorinated alternatives in recent years. Polyester itself is stable during normal wear, but the finish and any dyes applied during manufacturing are the chemical exposure points. Nautica has not publicly disclosed what water-repellent coating chemistry or dye processes they use on this specific product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nautica (owned by VF Corporation) has not released detailed chemical disclosure statements or sustainability reports specific to PFAS in their textile lines. The brand has not published certifications like bluesign, GOTS, or Oeko-Tex that would independently verify low-chemical processing. VF Corporation as a parent has faced pressure from advocacy groups regarding PFAS in outdoor apparel but has not committed to full fluorine-free water-repellent coating across all lines. No recalls or regulatory actions specific to Nautica textiles are on public record.

How it compares in its category

Standard polyester duffels at this price point typically carry similar water-repellent coating finish uncertainty. Brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have committed to PFAS-free water repellency and publish their chemical suppliers; competitors like generic Amazon or Walmart house brands offer no transparency at all. Nautica sits in the middle of the market: widely available but silent on chemistry, which is typical for legacy outdoor/casual brands that have not yet adopted transparency as a competitive feature. For travel duffels specifically, untreated canvas or heavy nylon alternatives exist but trade water resistance for openness about what was used.

If you buy it

Wash before first use in cool water to rinse out loose dyes and finish residues. Avoid machine-drying on high heat, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially release volatile compounds from the resin binders holding the polyester fibers together. Spot-clean or gentle hand-wash thereafter; aggressive detergents can strip the water repellent. If the duffel loses water resistance after one to three years, it signals coating degradation and is a natural replacement trigger, not a safety alarm. Store dry and well-ventilated to prevent mildew, which can create microbial contamination unrelated to the material itself.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

water-repellent coating finish (PFAS uncertainty)

Polyester duffels with water-repellent coatings commonly contain legacy or short-chain PFAS compounds. Nautica has not disclosed their water-repellent coating chemistry; grading is separate, but this is the primary chemical exposure vector for the product.

Possible

Formaldehyde-releasing resins in textile finishing

Polyester fabrics are often treated with formaldehyde-containing resin finishes to improve wrinkle resistance and dye setting. The Submariner Duffel label does not specify finish type. Off-gassing is typically low after the initial rinse and ventilation period, but individuals with formaldehyde sensitivity may experience mild irritation during first unpacking and use.

Possible

Azo dyes (colorfast dyes)

Standard polyester dyes can include azo compounds, some of which degrade into carcinogenic amines under sweat or UV exposure over extended time. Nautica does not certify their dyes against restricted azo standards (e.g., Oeko-Tex). Pre-washing and avoiding prolonged skin contact with damp fabric minimizes any theoretical exposure.

Possible

Microplastic shedding

Polyester textiles shed tiny plastic fibers during washing and wear. A duffel sees moderate mechanical stress (packing, dragging, compression) and if machine-washed will release microplastics into wastewater. This is a durability and environmental concern rather than direct health hazard, but relevant to informed use.

None known

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in polyester synthesis and can remain in trace amounts in finished fiber. No elevated levels or health incidents have been reported in consumer polyester duffels. This is a theoretical concern tracked in regulated textile testing but not substantiated as a risk in this product category.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Bags & Luggage

Watershed Goforth Dry Duffel

Watershed

Goforth Dry Duffel

Naturally textured cotton blend with proprietary waterproofing

F
F
PFASAll
F · High PFAS3 flags

Reputable brand with stated PFAS-free commitment.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More waterproof bags & luggage grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.